Case Details

Citation(s)
2004 SLG 1087 2004 SLD 1087 2004 SCMR 966
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petition No. 104 of 2000, decision dated: 23rd October, 2002.(On appeal from. the judgment of the High Court of Balochistan, Quetta, dated 27-4-2000 passed in Criminal Acquittal Appeal No.49 of 1999)
SH. RIAZ AHMAD, C.J. MUNIR A. SHEIKH MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, JJ
Raja Muhammad Afsar, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Salah-ud-Din Mangal, Advocate-General, Balochistan for
Respondent. S. A. M. Qaudri, Advocate-on-Record for Complainant

MUHAMMAD MURAD ABRO

VS

THE STATE through A.G. Balochistan

Law:

Section:

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)----S.540---Power to summon material witness etc.---Purpose---Purpose of S.540, Cr.P.C. is to enable the Court to go at the truth of the matter to come to a proper conclusion in the case under trial and in the peculiar circumstances it imposes a duty on the Court to summon a person in the, witness-box whose evidence is essential for just decision of the case----Under first part of S.540, Cr.P.C. the Court may, in its discretion summon of recall a person of a witness for examination or re¬examination, but under the second part it is obligatory for the Court to summon and examine or, recall and re-examine any person if his evidence appears essential for just decision of the case---Court cannot use the power under S.540, Cr.P.C. to advance the case of prosecution or that of defence---However, the Court should liberally use this discretionary power in a case in which the examination of a person is material and is essential to come to the proper conclusion. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)----- ----S.540---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)---Re-summoning of the, prosecution witness---Witness required to be re-examined claimed to have seen the occurrence and identified the accused at the spot and also in the identification parade---Evidence of the said witness, therefore, was essential for just decision of the case---Question that what had compelled the witness to change his statement at the trial and for what reason he desired to be re-examined could only be resolved in the light of his statement in re-examination---Fate of the case being dependent on the sole statement of the said witness, it would be unfair to the prosecution not to call him in the witness-box far re-examination and his re¬examination would not be against the interest of criminal administration of justice---Leave to appeal was refused to accused in circumstances. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, J.---This petition under Article 185(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic, of Pakistan has been directed against the judgment dated 22-4-2000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Balochistan in…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492