| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 1708 2006 SLD 1708 2006 PLC 556 |
National Industrial Relations Commission
Cases Nos.4A(101) and 24(102)/2002-K, decision dated: 6-06-2002.
ALI NAWAZ A. CHANNA, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Cases Nos.4A(101) and 24(102)/2002-K, decision dated: 6-06-2002.
ALI NAWAZ A. CHANNA, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
RAUF TEXTILE AND PRINTING MILLS EMPLOYEES UNION and 4 others
VS
Messrs RAUF TEXTILE AND PRINTING MILLS (PVT.) LTD. RAUF TEXTILE AND PRINTING MILLS EMPLOYEES UNION and 4 others vs Messrs RAUF TEXTILE AND PRINTING MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
Law:
Section:
(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-------S.22-A(8)(g)---National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedure and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Regln. 32(2)(c)---Unfair labour practice by employer---Petitioners, employees' Union along with four employees had filed petitions against Management alleging therein that Management had committed various acts of unfair labour practice to render their union redressed and ineffective and had violated different labour laws---Petitioners had not mentioned acts on which Management was annoyed with them and which had prompted it to take disciplinary action against them---Charge-sheets and show-cause notices issued to four employees had shown that they had refused to abide by fresh timings fixed by the management---Had management any ill-will or any grudge against petitioner-union, action should have been taken against office-bearers of union and not against those persons who were neither its office holders nor had any concern with the Union---Management had not committed any act of unfair labour practice in circumstances---Mere general type of allegations without any instance, would not constitute acts of unfair labour practice---Petition filed against Management was not maintainable, in circumstances---Main petition being not maintainable, petitioners were not entitled to any stay order---Both petition and stay application were dismissed. PLD 1988 SC 53 and 2001 PLC 156 ref. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----Ss.15, 25-A, 22-A(8)(c) & 34---West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.O.15(3)(4)---Unfair labour practice by employer---Proof---Violation of law---Initiation of enquiry against employees---Violation of any law by employer would not fall within any clause of S.15 of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 constituting unfair labour practice by employer---If there was any violation of law, Trade Union or Workers had right to approach Labour Court individually under S.25-A or through Trade Union under S.34 of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969---Employer had statutory right to initiate enquiry against any worker for alleged…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492