Law:

Section:

West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance (VI of 1960)-------S.10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3) Consolidation scheme confirmed in revenue hierarchy Validity Determination of revenue authorities in such matters could not be interfered by Supreme Court, unless and until same was perverse. Falak Sher and others v. Sharif and others 1989 SCMR 1096; Muhammad Khan and 2 others v. Muhammad and 6 others 1989 SCMR 1714 and Allah Rehman and others v. Amtul Qayyum and another 1989 SCMR 1817 rel. ORDER TANVIR AHMED KHAN, J. Leave to appeal is sought against the order dated 16 7 2001 whereby a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dismissed Writ Petition No. 11686 of 2001 filed by the petitioner maintaining the earlier determination of the learned Member, Board of Revenue. 2. The brief facts are that consolidation operation of village Langey, Tehsil and District, Gujrat, was confirmed on 30 6 1990 under section 10(3) of the Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960. The parties were certainly dissatisfied with the outcome of the consolidation, as such the matter ultimately came before the learned Member, Board of Revenue Punjab, who through his order dated 6 1 2001 after considering the reports submitted by the subordinate authorities, came to the conclusion that there was no justification to put the whole village again for reconsolidation. According to him, the defects as reflected from the reports were such that they could be rectified through appeals and revisions. Taking into consideration all the aspects of the case he directed the Consolidation Authorities to resolve the disputes and cure the defects, if any, through appeals and revisions which were filed subsequent to the order passed by him on 6 12=1997. It is pertinent to mention over here that the…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492