| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 1729 2006 SLD 1729 2006 PLC 625 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos.409 and 410-L of 2004, decision dated: 15-12-2005. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 27-10-2003 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, in Appeals Nos.841 of 2003 and 842 of 2003).
FAQIR MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR AND KARAMAT NAZIR BHANDARI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petitions Nos.409 and 410-L of 2004, decision dated: 15-12-2005. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 27-10-2003 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, in Appeals Nos.841 of 2003 and 842 of 2003).
FAQIR MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR AND KARAMAT NAZIR BHANDARI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, NAROWAL and others
VS
ANSAR PERVAIZ DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, NAROWAL and others vs ANSAR PERVAIZ
Law:
Section:
Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)-------S. 4---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)---Compulsory retirement---Respondents, who were appointed as Dispensers, were directed to get their services regularized within 90 days failing which they would be considered to be out of service---Representations of respondents having been rejected by Departmental Authorities they filed appeals before Service Tribunal which were partly allowed by impugned whereby their penalty of removal from service was converted into compulsory retirement---Respondents had rendered about 14/ 15 years' service---Authorities could not take benefit of their inaction at the relevant, film-Service Tribunal in facts and circumstances of the case, was quite justified in converting penalty of removal of respondents from service into compulsory retirement---Petitions not involving any substantial question of law of public importance within meaning of Art.212(3) of the Constitution, were dismissed and leave to appeal was refused. Aziz Ahmad Chughtai, Advocate Supreme Court with Rao Muhammad Yusuf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in both cases). Pervaiz Inayat Malik, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanveer Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.1. Date of hearing: 15th December, 2005. JUDGMENT FAQIR MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR, J.--- The petitioners, Government functionaries, seek leave to appeal from the judgment, dated 27-10-2003, passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, in Appeals Nos.841 and 842 of 2003. 2. The respondents were appointed as Dispensers in the Health Department, District Narowal. By order, dated 30-1-2003, they were directed to get their service regularized within 90 days failing which they would be considered to be out of service w.e.f. 1-5-2003. Their representations were rejected by the departmental authorities on 24-4-2003 and 5-4-2003 respectively. Therefore, they moved the Tribunal…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492