Case Details

Citation(s)
2006 SLG 3598 2006 SLD 3598 (2006) 283 ITR 374
Bombay High Court
IT APPEAL No. 88 OF 1999 AUGUST 8, 2005
J.H. BHATIA AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JJ.

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Commissioner of IncomE tax

v.

Shri Bhogawati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.*

Law:

Section:

Section 28(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business income - Chargeable as - Assessee, a co-operative sugar factory, collected various funds/deposits out of sugarcane purchase price payable to cane growers - Assessing Officer made addition on account of non-refundable deposits, Chief Minister's relief fund, area development fund, cane development fund, hutment fund, education fund, Chavan Memorial trust and interest on non-refundable deposits - Tribunal deleted addition holding that said funds/deposits were not trading receipts and could not be treated as income of assessee - Whether in view of decision of Supreme Court in CIT v. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. [2004] 270 ITR 1/139 Taxman 434 and Division Bench of Bombay High Court in Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. CIT [1998] 229 ITR 577, Tribunal was justified in deleting additions on account of non-refundable deposits, interest on non-refundable deposits, CM's Relief Fund, hutment fund, education fund and Chavan Memorial trust - Held, yes - Whether however, order deleting additions in respect of cane development fund was to be set aside - Held, yes - Whether, further, it was to be directed to decide matter relating to area development fund afresh after taking into consideration bye-laws and directives issued by Government in respect of use of area development fund - Held, yes CASE REVIEW CIT v. Shri Chhatrapati Sahkari Shakar Karkhana Ltd. [2004] 270 ITR 1 (SC) followed & relied upon. CASES REFERRED TO CIT v. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. [2004] 270 ITR 1/ 139 Taxman 434 (SC)[Para 2], Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. CIT [1998] 229 ITR 577 (Bom.) [Para 2] andCIT v. Malegaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. [2005] 148 Taxman 329 (Bom.) [Para 2]. Dr. P. Daniel and A.S. Rao for the Appellant. JUDGMENT J.H. Bhatia, J. - This appeal is preferred by the revenue under section 260A of the Income-tax Act against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The following substantial question of law is raised in the said Appeal : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the I.T.A.T. relying upon the Special Bench in the case of Shri Chhatrapati…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492