Case Details

Citation(s)
2004 SLG 854 2004 SLD 854 2004 SCMR 192
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 1058-L of 2000, decision dated: 4-03-2003.(On appeal from the judgment/order dated 11-2-2000 of the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, passed in Appeal No. 4012 of 1997)
JAVED IQBAL AND FAQIR MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR, JJ
Muhammad Hussain Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents

KHALIQ DAD-

VS

INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE and 2 others

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil service----Disciplinary proceedings and criminal proceedings---Differentia--¬Acquittal from criminal case---Effect---Both such proceedings are not inter dependent and can be initiated simultaneously and brought to logical end separately with different conclusions---Criminal proceedings do not constitute a bar for initiation of disciplinary proceedings under relevant Efficiency and Discipline Rules---Acquittal in criminal case would have no bearing on disciplinary action. Arif Ghafoor v. Managing Director PLD 2002 SC 13; Dy. I.-G. Police v. Anis-ur-Rehman Khan PLD 1985 SC 134; Muhammad Ayub v. Chairman, Electricity Board, WAPDA, Peshawar PLD 1987 SC 195; Muhammad Tufail v. Assistant Commissioner/Collector 1989 SCMR 361; Muhammad Nazir v. Superintendent of Police 1990 SCMR 1556; Talib Hussain v. Anar Gul Khan 1993 SCMR 2177; Muhammad Izharul Ahsan Qureshi v. P.LA.C. 1994 SCMR 1608 and Nawaz Khan v. Federal Government 1996 SCMR 315 rel. (b) Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975--- ----Rr. 4, 6 & 7---Dismissal from service---Misconduct---Non-holding of regular inquiry due to overwhelming evidence shown in show cause---No prejudice had been caused to civil servant since he had been afforded proper opportunity of hearing---Findings of Competent Authority were duly concurred by Appellate and Revisional Authorities and affirmed by Service Tribunal---No justification to differ with such findings---No illegality or infirmity in impugned was found---No question of law of public importance was involved---Supreme Court dismissed petition and declined leave to appeal. ORDER JAVED IQBAL, J.---This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11-2-2000 passed by the learned Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, whereby the appeal preferred on behalf of petitioner has been dismissed and order dated 12-12-1994 by S.P., Mianwali dismissing the service of petitioner has been kept intact. 2. Precisely stated the facts of the case are that petitioners was found gambling and resultantly a case under sections 5 and 7 of the Prevention of Gambling Act, 1977 was registered against him vide F.I.R. No.163, dated 11-11-1994. Before the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492