Case Details

Citation(s)
2003 SLG 976 2003 SLD 976 2003 PLC 918
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos.2844 to 3008 of 2001. decided on 30-10-2001.
IRSHAD HASSAN KHAN, CJ, CH. MUHAMMAD ARIF AND QAZI MUHAMMAD FAROOQ, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

GOVERNOR, STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and others

VS

SHAMSUL ISLAM and others

Law:

Section:

Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)---------S. 4---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)---Question of fact--­Factual controversy set at rest by Service Tribunal . in post .remand proceedings after conducting requisite inquiry---Such question could not be re-opened/re-agitated before Supreme Court. Khawaja Saeeduz Zafar, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 30th October, 2001. JUDGMENT QAZI MUHAMMAD FAROOQ, J.---Through this common judgment we intend to dispose of the above mentioned identical Civil Petitions No.2844 to 3008 of 2001, which have arisen from judgment, dated 28-7-2001 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal). 2. Brief facts are that in an earlier round Civil Petitions No.950 to 1113 of 2001 were brought before this Court by the Governor, State Bank of Pakistan and others against Bank-employees therein. The sole grievance expressed in those petitions was that the following observation made by the Chairman of the Tribunal in the impugned judgment therein was based on an erroneous assumption of fact:-- (a) During the course of hearing, the departmental representative candidly submitted that the income-tax recovered from the employees will be reimbursed to them. Those petitions were disposed of with the following observations:-- "(10) Needless to observe that in the connected petitions brought by the Governor, State Bank of Pakistan and others against the respondent/employees, the sole grievance, of the petitioners therein is that the observation of the learned Chairman of the Tribunal in the impugned Judgment to the effect: (a) during the course of hearing, the departmental representative candidly submitted that the income-tax recovery from fly.; Appellants will be reimbursed to them, is based on erroneous assumption of fact in that neither any Counsel for the bank nor any representative of the Bank made any statement before the Tribunal during the course of proceedings that income-tax will be reimbursed to the respondents/employees. With consent of Mr. Fakhruddin G. Ibrahim, Mr. Abdul Mujeeb Prizada, Mr. Muhammad Munir Peracha, Mr. M. Bilal and Mr.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492