Case Details

Citation(s)
2007 SLG 736 2007 SLD 736 2007 PLD 72
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 1202 and Murder Reference No. 541 of 2000, heard on 4th September, 2006
MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD AND IJAZ AHMAD CHAUDHARY, JJ
Syed Zahid Hussain Bukhari, Ms. Azma Zahid Bukhari and Imtiaz Hussain Baloch for Appellant. Muhammad Asghar Rokhari for the Complainant. Masood Sadiq Mirza assisted by Maqbool Ahmad Qureshi for the State

NIAZ MUHAMMAD

VS

THE STATE

Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 302(b),342,340(2),382

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 87

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Appreciation of evidence---Sentence, reduction in---Mitigating circumstances---Both prosecution witnesses, though were related to deceased, but their statements could not be discarded merely on the basis of relationship---Incident was a case of single accused and daylight occurrence and both prosecution witnesses had no previous enmity or ill-will against accused, so as to involve him in false case---Both witnesses had given a very consistent account of occurrence and had corroborated each other on almost all material points---Matter was reported promptly to the police within an hour---Minor discrepancies in prosecution evidence pointed out by counsel for accused, were of no consequence as same had cropped up naturally when evidence was recorded after delay of more than 5-1/2 years---Ocular account was fully supported by medical evidence which was also corroborated by factum of abscondence of accused---Prosecution had successfully proved its case against accused through ocular account, which was supported by medical evidence and corroborated by abscondence of accused---Case against accused was of capital sentence, but some mitigating circumstances existed in case of accused; firstly accused was less than 20 years of age on the date of occurrence; secondly, no ill-will or enmity existed between deceased and accused, who were almost of the same age prior to the occurrence; thirdly, motive as set down in the F.I.R. was trivial in nature and was not supported by any independent evidence; and, fourthly, accused was not carrying with him any fire-arm and left scene of occurrence after giving solitary blow with chhurri on the person of deceased---Maintaining conviction of accused for offence under S.302(b), P.P.C., his death sentence was reduced to imprisonment for life accordingly and benefit of S.382-B, Cr.P.C. which was mandatory, was also extended to him. Muhammad Sharif v. Muhammad Javed alias Jedda alias Tedy PLD 1976 SC 452 ref. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J.---This judgment will dispose of Criminal Appeal No.1202 of 2000 filed by Niaz Muhammad, who was convicted and sentenced by the learned Sessions Judge,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492