| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2003 SLG 733 2003 SLD 733 2003 SCMR 1836 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.2241-L of 2001, decision dated: 1st July, 2002. (On appeal from the order dated 26-4-2001 of the Lahore High Court, in Writ Petition No.3673 of 2001)
SH. RIAZ AHMED, C.J., SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN AND FAQIR MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR, JJ
S.M. Masud, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner
Civil Petition No.2241-L of 2001, decision dated: 1st July, 2002. (On appeal from the order dated 26-4-2001 of the Lahore High Court, in Writ Petition No.3673 of 2001)
SH. RIAZ AHMED, C.J., SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN AND FAQIR MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR, JJ
S.M. Masud, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner
MANZOOR AHMED
VS
HAMAD RAZA and others
Law:
Section:
West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)--- ----S.5 & Sched.---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)---Suit for maintenance by minor son and daughter---Family Court decreed the suit at the rate of Rs, 2,000 per month per child from date of suit till age of puberty ---Appeal filed by father was dismissed by Appellate Court and Constitutional petition also met the same fate---Validity---Father had not denied parentage of minors---Father had produced pay slip regarding his financial status showing that his monthly income was Rs.22,072 per month, and after deduction, he was taking home Rs.16,000 per month--Decretal amount was neither exorbitant nor disproportionate to father's earning sources---Supreme Court dismissed petition and refused leave. ORDER SH. RIAZ AHMED, C.J.---Leave to appeal is sought against an order dated 26-4-2001 whereby a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court dismissed the Constitution petition of the -Petitioner to assail the judgment of the Additional District Judge, Faisalabad dated 22-1-2001, by means of which judgment and decree of the trial Court dated 31-5-2000 was upheld. 2. Resume of facts giving rise to the institution of this petition for leave to appeal is that out of the wedlock between the -Petitioner and Mst. Nasreen Iqbal, -Respondents 1 and 2 were born. Subsequently differences arose between the spouses and ultimately, they fell apart. It is stated that both son and daughter of -Petitioner aged 9 and 6 respectively living with their mother and getting their education in a school, had instituted suit for maintenance on 16-3-1998 against the -Petitioner claiming maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs.2000 each per month. On account of non-appearance of the -Petitioner, he' was proceeded ex parte, but subsequently the ex parte order was set aside and -Petitioner had filed the written statement admitting the -Respondents as his son and daughter and reiterated that he was an Officer in the Allied Bank of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492