| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2003 SLG 939 2003 SLD 939 2003 PLC 574 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.3435--L of 2001, decision dated: 15-04-2002. (On appeal from the order dated 3-9-2001 of the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, passed in Appeal No. 1856 of 2000).
ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR AND TANVIR AHMAD KHAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition No.3435--L of 2001, decision dated: 15-04-2002. (On appeal from the order dated 3-9-2001 of the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, passed in Appeal No. 1856 of 2000).
ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR AND TANVIR AHMAD KHAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
GHULAM RASOOL
VS
COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE and 2 others
Law:
Section:
Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975-------R.4---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)---Dismissal form service---Admission of guilt---Civil servant was charge-sheeted oil the allegation of issuance of arms licences without sanction from the District Magistrate---- Departmental inquiry was conducted against the civil servant and on his failure to reply the charge-sheet satisfactorily major penalty of removal from service was recommended-- -Competent Authority after affording opportunity of personal hearing to the civil servant, imposed major penalty of removal from service---Service Tribunal declined to interfere with the order of dismissal passed against the civil servant---Plea raised by the civil servant was that he had been falsely implicated in the case ---Validity--Proper procedure as laid down under Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency anti Discipline) Rules 1975 had been adopted and the civil servant had beats removed from service in accordance with law after issuing him a charge-sheet and holding preliminary and final inquiries in the matter with a chatter of personal hearing---Inquiry reports revealed that the civil servant during personal hearing had admitted that he had prepared/issued a lot of arms licences and such fact was admission of guilt of the charges levelled against him---Supreme Court declined to interfere with the order of dismissal--Leave to appeal was refused. M.S. Baqir, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Salahuddin, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 15th April, 2002. JUDGMENT ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, J.---The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 3-9-2001 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, in Service Appeals Nos. 1855 and 1857 of 2000 whereby the same were dismissed. 2. The facts leading to the filing of the petition are that the petitioner while posted as Junior Clerk in the Office of Deputy Commissioner, Okara, in Arms Licensing Branch, prepared/signed so many application forms of Arms Licence without police reports and sanctions of the District Magistrate. The petitioner was charge-sheeted with several allegations that he issued' arms…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492