| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2002 SLG 1369 2002 SLD 1369 2002 SCMR 1247 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 47-L of 2002, decision dated: 8-03-2002, hearing DATE : 8-03-2002. (On appeal from the judgment dated 27-12-2001 of the Lahore High Court passed in Cr. A. 988 of 2002 and M.R. No. 451-T/2000)
JAVED IQBAL, TANVIR AHMED KHAN AND SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN, JJ
Rab Nawaz Khan Niazi, Advocate Supreme Court Aasim Jafri, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Petitioner. Nemo for the State.
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 47-L of 2002, decision dated: 8-03-2002, hearing DATE : 8-03-2002. (On appeal from the judgment dated 27-12-2001 of the Lahore High Court passed in Cr. A. 988 of 2002 and M.R. No. 451-T/2000)
JAVED IQBAL, TANVIR AHMED KHAN AND SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN, JJ
Rab Nawaz Khan Niazi, Advocate Supreme Court Aasim Jafri, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Petitioner. Nemo for the State.
AMJAD JAVED-
VS
THE STATE
Law:
Section:
(a) Penal Code (XL V of 1860)---Ss. 302 & 302(b)---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S.7(ii)--Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 3---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)---Child eye-witness aged 5/1-2 years used to- accompany his deceased sister aged 10 years to the house of accused being their tutor and as such the question of his absence from the place of occurrence did not arise who had communicated the information of the incident to his father (complainant)---Trial Court had recorded the statement of the said child witness after having found him intelligent enough to portrait the facts of the event---Statement of the said witness was consistent, worthy of credence, straightforward and confidence-inspiring having the ring of truth and innocence, on the basis of which conviction could safely be recorded and which had been corroborated by circumstantial evidence, medical evidence, recovery, of blood-stained hatchet duly supported by the report of the Serologist and the extra judicial confession made by accused which was also supported by other credible evidence---Accused was also seen running from the place of occurrence by the prosecution witnesses who had no animus or malice whatsoever against him---Absence of motive could hardly affect the overwhelming incriminating evidence led by the prosecution---Courts below having not clarified as to under which clause of S.302, P.P.C. the conviction was awarded and as the same could not be . awarded under S.302(a), P.P.C. without undertaking "Tazkiyah-al-Shahood"---Supreme Court . substituted S.302, P.P.C. to S.302(b), P.P.C. while maintaining the death sentence of accused, as a young girl had been murdered in a barbaric, callous and merciless manner---Leave to appeal was refused accordingly. Muhammad Ajmal v. The State 1997 SCMR 1595; Sarfraz Khan v The State 1996 SCMR 188 and Mumtaz Ahmad v. The State PLD 1990 FSC 38 ref. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---S. 302(a)---Punishment with death as Qisas---Tazkiyah-al-Shahood--Tazkiyah-al-Shahood may be undertaken at the end of the evidence at least in criminal cases and it can be done even at the appellate stage or by remanding case if the facts and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492