Law:

Section:

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-----Arts.25 & 199---Constitutional petition---Selection for vacancy---Discrimination policy decision, following of---Petitioner applied for a post advertised by the Authorities but was not appointed as he secured less marks than the respondents---Grievance of the petitioner was that for the years of experience, one mark was allocated to the candidates for each completed year ­and as he had experience of 4 years, 6 months and 18 days; therefore, period of more than 6 months should have been counted as one year and instead of giving 4 marks the Authorities should have given 5 marks ---Validity--­According to the policy of the Government, the broken period of less than one year whatever it might be was not countable--- Policy was uniform for all the candidates and the petitioner had not been discriminated as the respondents had also additional experience for more than 6/7 months but that too was ignored---Representation of the petitioner had been duly considered by the department but in the light of the policy decision his representation could not be accepted---Petitioner in the present case, had been treated equally and no discrimination was apparent qua other respondents---Marks of the petitioner had been correctly calculated for experience and had been awarded 4 marks for which he was entitled and that no discrimination had been trade in the case of petitioner---High Court declined to interfere with the selection trade by the Authorities--Petition was dismissed in limine. Adam Khan for Petitioner. Jehanzeb Rahim, A.-G. for Responder (on Pre-admission Notice) ORDER MUHAMMAD QAIM JAN KHAN, J.---The Constitutional petition in hand is directed against the order of respondent No-4 dated 20-3-2002 regarding the recommendation of petitioner to the Government for appointment as Assistant' Director/Deputy D.E.O. (now E.D.O.)/Institute Vice President (Principal) (BPS-18) in the Education Department and also against letter No.9253 dated 27-3-2002, vide which his representation has been rejected and instead respondents 6 to 12 have been appointed. 2. It is alleged that respondent No.1 advertised a number of vacancies including eleven…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492