Case Details

Citation(s)
2005 SLG 724 2005 SLD 724 2005 PLD 408
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeals Nos.51 and 52 of 1998 and Criminal Petition No. 140 of 1998, decision dated: 7-03-2005. (On appeal from the judgment dated 26-6-1997 of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar, passed in Ehtesab Case Nos. 2, 3 and 4 of 1997).
NAZIM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI, C.J., JAVED IQBAL AND ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

CHIEF EHTESAB COMMISSIONER, CHIEF EHTESAB COMMISISONERS SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD /

VS

AFTAB AHMAD KHAN SHERPAO, EXCHIEF MINSITER, N.W.F.P. PESHAWAR and others CHIEF EHTESAB COMMISSIONER, CHIEF EHTESAB COMMISISONERS SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD / vs AFTAB AHM

Law:

Section:

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-------S.265-D---Discharge of accused---Principles---Trial Court to examine the entire material placed on record by prosecution, before exercising the powers under S.265-D, Cr.P.C. (b) Ehtesab Act (IX of 1997)----- ----S. 3(1)(c)(d)---Offence of corruption and corrupt practices---Scope--­Allegation against the accused was that he allotted plots to his co-accused in violation of approved Housing Scheme for construction of Government residences which caused loss to Housing Project ---Ehtesab Bench discharged the accused in exercise of powers under S.265-D, Cr.P.C.---Validity---Essential requirement for bringing the offence within the ambit of S.3(1)(c)(d) of Ehtesab Act, 1997, was that a holder of public office or any other person covered by such term by abusing his position as a holder, of public office, had sought for himself, or for his spouse or dependents any property, valuable thing .,or pecuniary advantage by corrupt, dishonest or illegal means---Prosecution did not produce any evidence to show the same---Neither the applications filed by the co-accused for allotment of plots were produced with the reference, .nor the allotment orders were placed on record; in such circumstances, it could not be said that even offence had commenced--­Grounds which weighed with the Ehtesab Bench to discharge the accused were convincing and were based on sound reasoning and thus were not open to interference---Appeal was dismissed. Ms. Nahida Mahboob Elahi, D.A.-G. and. Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant/Petitioner. Zehoorul Haq, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Syed Zafar Abbas Zaidi, Advocate Supreme Court and M.S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents. Date of hearing: 7th March, 2005. JUDGMENT ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, J. ---By this common judgment, we propose to dispose of Criminal Appeal Nos. 51, 52 of 1998 and Criminal Petition No. 140 of 1998 as they arise out of judgment dated 26-6-1997 passed by a learned Division Bench of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar, in Ehtesab Reference Nos. 2, 3 and 4 of 1997 whereby respondents were discharged under section 265-D Cr.P.C. 2. Above mentioned Ehtesab References were filed…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492