| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1969 SLG 714 1969 SLD 714 (1969) 19 TAX 229 1969 PTD 317 1969 PLD 278 |
Sindh High Court
Civil Reference No. 89 of 1959, decided on 10-12-1968.
DORAB PATEL AND QADEERUDDIN AHMAD, JJ.
Ghias Mohammad, Attorney General, with S.A. Nusrat, Advocate and Haider Pirzada, Advocate, for the Appellant. A.K.Brohi, Ali Athar, Bhojani Rafiqul Haq, Advocate from Dacca and Khalid Anwar, Advocates, for the
Respondent.
Civil Reference No. 89 of 1959, decided on 10-12-1968.
DORAB PATEL AND QADEERUDDIN AHMAD, JJ.
Ghias Mohammad, Attorney General, with S.A. Nusrat, Advocate and Haider Pirzada, Advocate, for the Appellant. A.K.Brohi, Ali Athar, Bhojani Rafiqul Haq, Advocate from Dacca and Khalid Anwar, Advocates, for the
Respondent.
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax (CENTRAL), KARACHI
V.
HABIB INSURANCE, CO. LTD., KARACHI
Law: Income Tax Act, 1922
Section: 2(4),2(6C),10(7),66(1),FirstSched.-Rule3 ,6
Law: Companies Act, (VII of 1913)
Section: 8(2)
Income-tax Act, 1922 -- Sections 2(4), 2(6C), 10(7), 66(1), First Sched. - Rule 3, 6 -- Insurance Act, 1938 -- Sections 2(9) (b), 10, 11, 14, 33, 58 -- Companies Act 1913 - Section 8(2) - Government of India Act, 1935 -- Insurance company - Under Memorandum of Association entitled to carry on business of investment - Purchase and sale of immovable properties and preference shares -- Surplus arising out of transactions and appreciated value of properties and shares taken to the balance sheet of the company -- Surplus and appreciation, whether liable to tax -- Held yes -- '"Income", meaning of -- Insurance company - Accounts -- Insurance company doing insurance and non-insurance business -- Accounts for insurance business maintained in forms prescribed in Schedule to the Insurance Act -- Accounts for non-insurance business, whether should be maintained separately - Held yes -- Insurance company - Whether debarred form doing non-insurance business -- Held no -- Business of insurance -- "'Insurer" -- Definition - Act does not prohibit an insurer from carrying on non-insurance business Insurer carrying on ""non-insurance business" -- Separate accounts have to be prepared by him for such business -- "Business" - Definition -- Purchase and sale of shares - When constitute "business of investment."-- Company -- Memorandum of limited liability company containing "primary object" - Construction - Other clauses in Memorandum to be understood as ancillary to main object of Company - Words "other assets" in Rule 3 -- Held, include "immovable property" -- Computation of profits and gain of insurance business -- No distinction drawn by Section 10 between insurers -- Argument that only income of mutual insurance associations can be calculated according to rules of Schedule -- Held, cannot, be accepted -- Question as formulated presupposing valied existence of rule 3 and 6 -- Plea that, rule 3 and 6 were illegal raised before High Court -- Held, not. within ambit, of question referred -- "'Income" -- Definition -- Word to be construed in widest, possible manner - Includes capital gains on application of investments as provided in Rule 3 and 6 even though such gains not realised…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492