| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 1826 2006 SLD 1826 2006 PLC 1112 |
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeals Nos. 319(K)(C.S.), 320 (K) (C.S.) and 323(K)(CS) of 2002, decision dated: 13-09-2004.
QAZI MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI AND RASHID ALI MIRZA, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeals Nos. 319(K)(C.S.), 320 (K) (C.S.) and 323(K)(CS) of 2002, decision dated: 13-09-2004.
QAZI MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI AND RASHID ALI MIRZA, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ALI GOHAR SAITHO and 2 others
VS
DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN POST OFFICE, ISLAMAMBAD, and 2 others ALI GOHAR SAITHO and 2 others vs DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN POST OFFICE, ISLAMAMBAD, and 2 others
Law:
Section:
Civil service-------Change of cadre---Employees working in BS-9 were promoted to BS-11 and were re-designated as Assistant Superintendent---Subsequently Authorities abolished post of BS-11 and employees were accommodated against the post of A.P.M. Counter---Representation of employees to Authorities praying that they be adjusted against post of Assistant Superintendent Post Office was rejected by Authorities---Employees had complained that change of their cadre was made without obtaining any option from them and without providing them any opportunity of personal hearing---In another order passed in another case, order of Authorities regarding change of cadre passed without obtaining any option from employees or without providing them opportunity of being heard, was set aside by Service Tribunal and Authorities were directed either to adjust employees in their original cadre against vacant posts or provide employees opportunity of personal hearing of option for the purpose of change of cadre. Shams-uz-Zaman and others v. Director-General, Pakistan Post Office Department, Islamabad and others Appeal Nos. 1371(L)/99 and others and Hameed Akhtar Niazi v. The Secretary, Establishment Division, Government of Pakistan and others 1996 SCMR 1185 ref. Sanaullah Noor Ghouri for Appellants. Asif Mange, Standing Counsel with Dr. Tufail Ahmed for the Respondents. Date of hearing: 9th September, 2004. JUDGMENT QAZI MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI (MEMBER).---By this single judgment, we shall dispose of the above-mentioned three appeals, which are based on identical facts and law. 2. The Appellants had joined the respondents-Department on different dates. They had been working as IBRL (BS-9). They were promoted to BS-11 and were re-designated as Assistant Superintendent (BRL) w.e.f. 1-7-1994. On 29-6-1999, under the orders of Respondent No.1., the Respondents abolished the post of ASSRLs B-15 (SG and B-11). Consequently, the Appellants were accommodated against the post of APM Counter under the order of respondent No.1. Being aggrieved the such orders, the appellants sent representations on 30-6-1999 to the respondent No.1 praying that they be adjusted against the post of Assistant…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492