Case Details

Citation(s)
2006 SLG 1838 2006 SLD 1838 2006 PLC 1232
Service Tribunal, N.W.F.P.
Appeals Nos.909 of 2004 and Appeals Nos.937 to 940, 196, 197, 237 and 238 of 2005, decision dated: 14-11-2005.
ABDUL SATTAR KHAN, CHAIRMAN AND AZMAT HANIF ORAKZAI, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

PROFESSOR DR. GHULAM NABI

VS

AKRAM KHAN DURANI, CHIEF MINISTER N.W.F.P. QUA COMPETENT AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR and 3 others PROFESSOR DR. GHULAM NABI vs AKRAM KHAN DURANI, CHIEF MINISTER N.W.F.P. QUA COMPETENT AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR and 3 others

Law:

Section:

North-West Frontier Province Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (V of 2000)------Ss. 3 & 5---North-West Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), S.4---Imposition of penalty of reduction to the lower post---Appeal---At relevant time when appellant was posted as Head of' E.N.T. Department and Vice-Principal of the Medical College concerned, an incident had taken place in which one Doctor of said college was murdered and attempt at the life of other one was made---Said occurrence gave rise to severe agitation by the students and staff of college concerned---Unruly and excited mob could not be controlled even by the police and District Executives---Appellant was proceeded against by serving him show-cause notice and major penalty of reduction to lower post, was imposed upon him on certain allegations including that he failed to control the said situation---Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against appellant by issuing him a show-cause notice, but neither charge was framed against him nor same was communicated to him---Effect---Statement of allegations was not a mere formality, but a mandatory requirement of law---No regular enquiry was conducted in the case, whereas holding of a regular enquiry was essential in the case in view of serious nature of charge against appellant---Enquiry, if any, was conducted, was defective as same was allegedly conducted by a Grade-19 officer, while appellant was Grade 20 officer---Unruly mob, which could not be controlled by District Administration, how could have been controlled by the appellant---Punishment awarded to appellant being not warranted by law, was amenable to interference by Service Tribunal---Appeal was accepted as prayed for. PLC 1989 (C.S.) 235 & 532; PLD 1971 SC 61, 71 & 124; PLD 1975 LHC 780; PLD 1975 SC 678; 1999 SCMR 1311; 2003 SCMR 104; 1988 SCMR 1316; PLD 1969 SC 65; PLD 1976 SC 37; 2004 PLC (C.S.) 959; 2003 PLC (C.S.) 353; 2004 PLC (C.S.) 1400; 2004 PLC (C.S.) 1293; 2004 SCMR 1662; 1996 SCMR 802; PLD 1981 SC 176; 1993 SCMR 1440; PLD 1982 Peshawar 165; 1999 PLC (C.S.) 1332; 2004 PLC (C.S.) 1591; 2004 PLC (C.S.) 1583; 2004 PLC (C.S.) 1306; 2004 PLC (C.S.) 688; 2005 SCMR…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492