| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2003 SLG 1002 2003 SLD 1002 2003 PLC 961 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.20 of 1999, decision dated: 23rd July, 2002. (On appeal from from the order of D.R.(J) dated 12-10-1999 passed under Order V, Rule 3 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980).
SH. RIAZ AHMED, C.J., MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL AND MUHAMMAD NAWAZ AHBASI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.20 of 1999, decision dated: 23rd July, 2002. (On appeal from from the order of D.R.(J) dated 12-10-1999 passed under Order V, Rule 3 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980).
SH. RIAZ AHMED, C.J., MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL AND MUHAMMAD NAWAZ AHBASI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
NADIR SHAH, S.D.O., MINOR CANAL CELL, IRRIGATION SUB-DIVISION, DERA MURAD JAMALI and 2 others
VS
SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT, BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA and 7 others
Law:
Section:
Balochistan Civil Servants Act (IX of 1974)-------S.8---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)---Seniority---Ad hoc appointees placed senior to civil servants selected by Public Service Commission ---Service Tribunal set aside such seniority and placed regular civil servants senior to ad hoc appointees---Plea raised by the ad hoc appointees was that seniority was not a vested right of a civil servant under Balochistan Civil Servants Act, 1974, therefore, appeals before Service Tribunal were bound to be dismissed---Validity---In case of persons appointed by initial recruitment, their seniority inter se would be fixed in accordance with the order of merit assigned by Public Service Commission, provided the persons selected for in a later selection---Ad hoc appointees would be entitled to count seniority from the date of their regularization and not from the date of initial appointment---Supreme Court declined to take any exception to the law laid down by Supreme Court in earlier s--Leave to appeal was refused. Wajahat Hussain v. Province of the Punjab PLD 1991 SC 82 rel. Muhammad Munir Peracha. Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellants. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 23rd July, 2002. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, J.---This Civil Miscellaneous appeal has been directed against the order dated 12-10-1999 passed by the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court through which the petition under Article 185(3) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 preferred against a common judgment dated 12-8-1999 passed by the Balochistan Service Tribunal. Quetta in 4 separate service appeals, was returned to the Advocate-on-Record for filing independent petitions. The appeal was heard in chambers on 24-1-2000. The learned counsel was directed to tile certified copies and grounds of appeal in each case within a fortnight. Upon compliance of the order, the matter was again fixed in chambers on 12-4-2000 and it was directed that appeal be re-listed in Court and as per direction vide order dated 20-11-2000, the Civil Miscellaneous Application No.20 of 1999 alongwith main petition was re listed in Court on…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492