Case Details

Citation(s)
2006 SLG 1621 2006 SLD 1621 2006 PLC 226
Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal, Sindh
Service Appeal No.33 of 2002, decision dated: 21st May, 2005.
MUHAMMAD MOOSA, K. LEGHARI, CHAIRMAN AND REHMAT HUSSAIN, JAFFERI, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MEHMOOD AHMED

VS

HIGH COURT OF SINDH through Registrar MEHMOOD AHMED vs HIGH COURT OF SINDH through Registrar

Law:

Section:

Sindh Service Tribunal Act (XV of 1973)-------S. 3-B---Subordinate Judiciary Service---Adverse remarks---Expunction of---Appeal---Reporting Officer/District and Sessions Judge while recording A.C.R. of the appellant for the relevant year, had recorded that attitude of appellant, who was working as P.S.I. as well as Assistant Public Attorney, towards Advocates and litigant public, was discourteous; he did not dispose of even a single case on merits; he was alleged to be illegally using a motor car, which was the case property and that on various occasions he refused to pass orders on the surety documents and purposely left the Court premises during office hours without passing orders thereon---Appellant was not enjoying good reputation and was reportedly playing in the hands-of Court Moharar---Pen picture of the appellant had further revealed that he was provided counselling, inasmuch as during inspection, he was pointed out his weak points by Reporting Officer and he was advised to improve, but with no result, as he did not respond to the counselling---Appellant was provided a personal hearing, but he could not advance any plausible explanation for expunction of remarks recorded in his A.C.R. for the relevant year---Very strong and valid reasons supported by specific instances regarding conduct of appellant were assigned by Reporting Officer and he was provided adequate opportunity to submit his explanation and to vindicate his position vis-a-vis the adverse remarks, but he could not put forward any thing in rebuttal---Representation of the appellant in circumstances was rightly rejected---Mere delay in communication of adverse remarks in A.C.Rs. would not be a valid ground to expunge the same---Appeal against adverse remarks recorded in the A.C.R., was dismissed, in circumstances. 2004 PLC (C.S.) 236; Government of Punjab and another v. Ehsanul Haq Sethi PLD 1986 SC 684; Syed Tahir Hussain Sherazi v. The Governor of the Punjab 1990 SCMR 1510 and Lahore High Court Lahore through Registrar v. K.M. Sohel 2001 PLC (C.S.) 1253 ref. Abrar Bukhari for Appellant. Ahmed Pirzada, A. A. G for Respondent. Date of hearing:16th April, 2005. ORDER MUHAMMAD MOSSA K. LAGHARI…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492