| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2004 SLG 955 2004 SLD 955 2004 SCMR 606 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 1257 of 2001, decision dated: 11-07-2003.hearing DATE : 7-05-2003.(From the order dated 16-4-2001 passed by the Lahore High Court, in Writ Petition No.6119 of 2001)
SH. RIAZ AHMAD, C.J., MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL AND MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, JJ
Maqbool Elahi Malik, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, M.S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record with Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. S.M. Zafar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 1257 of 2001, decision dated: 11-07-2003.hearing DATE : 7-05-2003.(From the order dated 16-4-2001 passed by the Lahore High Court, in Writ Petition No.6119 of 2001)
SH. RIAZ AHMAD, C.J., MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL AND MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, JJ
Maqbool Elahi Malik, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, M.S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record with Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. S.M. Zafar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents
MUHAMMAD USMAN QAYYUM
VS
UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, LAHORE and 5 others
Law:
Section:
Educational institution--- Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185---Examination of Civil Engineering---Re-evaluation of marks, prayer for---Supreme Court on account of hostile attitude and mala fides on the part of Engineering University nominated three independent and impartial persons to re¬evaluate two papers of the appellant---Appellant after re-evaluation secured first position in such papers---University, despite such position, did not declare result of appellant, over which Supreme Court directed the University to declare his result and issue him requisite certificates--¬University did not invite appellant to attend Convocation, over which Supreme Court again directed the University to award him degree and medals in a ceremonial manner, but University handed over the same to him in a sealed cover---University, in order to assess capability of appellant required him to take practical and viva voce examination of final year---Appellant apprehended that University would not give him fair deal in such matter, thus, Supreme Court appointed an ex¬ Superintending Engineer for such purpose---Such Engineer found appellant over all capable towards his technical know-how regarding all his final year subjects' sectional work, practical and viva voce examination excellent, which was compatible with marks obtained by him in relevant theory papers---Supreme Court accepted appeal with directions to University to notify result of appellant, award him all medals, certificates and with request to Engineering Council to register him as Engineer. JUDGMENT SH. RIAZ AHMAD, C.J.---This appeal through leave of this Court is directed against the order dated 16-4-2001 delivered by a learned Judge of the Lahore High Court whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant Muhammad Usman Qayyum voicing his grievances against the treatment accorded to him by the University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore hereinafter called the University, was dismissed. 2. The background and the circumstances of this case are startling in nature and require to be summarized in order to reach a just and fair conclusion. The appellant had a brilliant academic record. He has secured 742 marks out…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492