| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 1630 2006 SLD 1630 2006 PLC 261 |
National Industrial Relations Commission
Case Nos.4A (119)/03-L and 24 (129)/03-L decided on 8-09-2004.
SYED AKHTAR NAQI NAQVI, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Case Nos.4A (119)/03-L and 24 (129)/03-L decided on 8-09-2004.
SYED AKHTAR NAQI NAQVI, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
AHMED ALI AYAZ
VS
LESCO and others AHMED ALI AYAZ vs LESCO and others
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002)---------Ss. 49(e) & 63--Unfair Labour practice by employer---Petition against----Show-cause notice served upon petitioner under certain allegations regarding theft of electricity meters and misreading of said meters had been challenged by petitioner under S.49(e) of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002 alleging that he had been victimized due to his Trade Union activities---Petitioner had submitted reply to said show-cause notice, but no further action could be taken as petitioner had knocked the door of National Industrial Relations Commission---Irrespective of question of jurisdiction of the Commission, petitioner did not wait for the response of respondents on his reply to show-cause notice and restrained respondents from any further action by obtaining an interim stay order---Nothing was on record to show that respondents had committed any unfair labour practice---Had it been so, some penal action could have been taken against petitioner, but only a show-cause notice was issued to him---Representative of authorities had committed that if reply to show-cause notice issued to petitioner was not found satisfactory, no action would be taken against petitioner without a regular inquiry---Petition filed by petitioner being premature respondents were allowed to proceed further on the reply of show-cause notice submitted by petitioner and if need arose petitioner could move National Industrial Relations Commission, subject to question of jurisdiction. M. Azeem Muzammal Ch. for petitioner. Rashid Ahmed, SDO for/Representative/Respondents. ORDER SYED AKHTAR NAQI NAQVI, MEMBER.---The petitioner has filed the petition under section 49(c) of the I.R.O., 2002 in which he has contended that he being a worker of minor nature has been fulfilling his duties and obligations with the best of his efforts and has never deliberately shown any carelessness, but the respondent No.1 in connivance with the respondent No.2, on the basis of absolutely frivolous allegations issued a show-cause notice (Annex-A) to the petitioner dated 16-7-2003 received by the petitioner on 18-7-2003; that the petitioner replied the above said show-cause…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492