| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2010 SLG 2713 2010 SLD 2713 2010 SCMR 681 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Shariat Petition No.2 of 2008, decision dated: 31st March, 2009
JUSTICE M. JAVED BUTTAR, CHAIRMAN, JUSTICES ZIA PERVEZ, MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, DR. ALLAMA KHALID MEHMOOD AND ALLAMA RASHID AHMED, JULLUNDHARI, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Criminal Shariat Petition No.2 of 2008, decision dated: 31st March, 2009
JUSTICE M. JAVED BUTTAR, CHAIRMAN, JUSTICES ZIA PERVEZ, MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, DR. ALLAMA KHALID MEHMOOD AND ALLAMA RASHID AHMED, JULLUNDHARI, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Haji BAKHTAWAR SAID MUHAMMAD
VS
. Mst. DUR-ESHAHWAR BEGUM and others
Law:
Section:
Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance (VIII of 1979)-------Ss. 6, 7 & 14---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.203-F(2B)---Trial Court had refused to frame the charge under section 7 of the Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance, 1979, on the ground that the petitioner had levelled the charge of adultery etc. against the respondent during the subsistence of marriage and that the dispute being between husband and wife, S.14 of the said Ordinance was attracted in the case---Federal Shariat Court accepting the revision petition filed by the respondent set aside the order of Trial Court and remanded the case with the direction to frame the charge under Ss.6 & 7 of the Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance, 1979, and proceed with the case in accordance with law-Validity-Relationship of husband and wife (between the parties) had admittedly come to an end on the day when the petitioner had divorced the respondent and executed the divorce deed---Facts disclosed by the petitioner in his evidence adduced during preliminary inquiry under S.202, Cr.P.C. had revealed that the petitioner and respondent were just a man and a women and not husband and wife, when the petitioners in his three written statements, before his elder brother and allegedly also before a Punchayat in his own house, had made imputation of Zina against the respondent and explicitly alleged that all of her three children were illegitimate children---Action of petitioner, therefore, had clearly attracted the provisions of Ss.6 & 7 of the Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance, 1979, and there was no question of S.14 of the said Ordinance being attracted in the case---Leave to appeal was refused to petitioner by Supreme Court accordingly. Qur'an Sura Al-Noor: 3 and Mussalman Law by Charlas Hamilton p.197 ref. Sh. Zamir Hussain, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Zulfiqar Khalid Malooka, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent No.1. Mian Asif Mumtaz, D.P.-G., Punjab, for the State. ORDER DR. ALLAMA KHALID MEHMOOD, J.--- Petitioner seeks leave to appeal against judgment dated 25-1-2008 whereby the learned Federal Shariat Court accepted (Criminal…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492