Case Details

Citation(s)
1969 SLG 6 1969 SLD 6 1969 PLD 187
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeals Nos. 49, 50 and 51 of 1968, decision dated: 6th February 1969
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C, J., SAJJAD AHMAD AND ABDUS SATTAR, JJ
M. B. Zaman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Appellant.
Respondent in person

ADNAN AFZAL

VS

CAPT. SHER AFZAL

Law: Family Courts Act, 1964

Section: 5

(a) Interpretation of statutes-Retrospectively of legislation---­Matter retrospective if it is merely procedural in nature-Such matter, however, would not operate retrospectively if it touches a right in existence at time of passing of legislation-Matters of procedure, what are. The general principle with regard to the interpretation of statutes as laid down in the well known case of the Colonial Sugar Refining Company Limited v. Irving 1901 A C 369 is that "if the matter in question be a matter of procedure only", the provisions would be retrospective. "On the other hand, if it be more than a matter of procedure, if it touches a right in existence at the passing of the Act", then "in accordance with a long line of authorities extending from the time of Lord Coke to the present day'", the legislation would not operate retrospectively, unless the Legislature had either "by express enactment or by necessary intendment" given the legislation retroactive effect. To the same effect are the observations of Jessel, Master of the Rolls, in the case of In re : Joseph Suche & Co. Limited (1875) 1 Ch. D. 48 where it was observed that as "a general rule when the Legisla­ture alters the rights of parties by taking away or conferring any right of action, its enactments, unless in express terms they apply to pending actions, do not affect them. It is said that there is one exception to that rule, namely, that, these enactments merely affect procedure and do not extend to rights of action, they have been held to apply to existing rights." The next question, therefore, that arises for consideration is as to what are matters of procedure. It is obvious that matters relating to the remedy, the mode of trial, the manner of taking evidence and forms of action are all matters relating to procedure. Crawford too takes the view that questions relating to jurisdiction over a cause of action, venue, parties, pleadings and rules of evidence also pertain to procedure, provided the burden of proof is not shifted. Thus a statute purporting to transfer jurisdiction over certain causes of action may operate retroactively. This is what is meant by saying that a change of forum by a law is…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492