| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 1646 2006 SLD 1646 2006 PLC 307 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
C.P. No.501-L of 2005, decision dated: 27-01-2006. (On appeal from the order, dated 24-1-2005 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal Lahore in Appeal No.670(L) of 1999).
JAVED IQBAL AND CH. IJAZ AHMAD, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
C.P. No.501-L of 2005, decision dated: 27-01-2006. (On appeal from the order, dated 24-1-2005 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal Lahore in Appeal No.670(L) of 1999).
JAVED IQBAL AND CH. IJAZ AHMAD, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MAQBOOL AHMAD
VS
PAKISTAN AGRICULTURAL and others MAQBOOL AHMAD vs PAKISTAN AGRICULTURAL and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)-------Art. 129(g)---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212 (3)---Dismissal from service---Non-production of available evidence---Presumption---Concurrent findings of fact by the forums below---Civil servant in a letter, admitted his responsibility of causing loss to Government, thus he was dismissed from service---Penalty imposed by the authorities was maintained by Service Tribunal-Validity-Civil servant did not attach copy of the letter in which he had admitted the responsibility in writing---Such fact alone was sufficient that contents of the letter with regard to the admission of civil servant presumed to be correct and inference could be drawn against him under the provisions of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984---Inquiry Officer after proper appreciation of record found the civil servant guilty, which was approved subsequently by all the forums---Supreme Court was not required to act as a Court of appeal for reappraisal of evidence recorded by Inquiry Officer---Charges against the civil servant were supported' by evidence produced by Authorities---Judgment passed by Service Tribunal was in accordance with the dictum laid down by Supreme Court---Civil servant failed to point out any evidence which could persuade Supreme Court to hold that finding rendered by all the Service Tribunals against him were arbitrary, illegal or against the record---Concurrent actions of the authorities and of Service Tribunal were unexceptionable---No substantial question of law of public importance was involved in the case---Leave to appeal was refused. Javed Aziz Qureshi's case 1998 SCMR 2553; Abdul Rehman's case 1988 SCMR 1711 and Abdul Hameed's case 1979 SCMR 503 rel. (b) Words and phrases--- ----"Satisfied"---Defined. Blyth's case 1966 AER 524; Angland v. Payne 1944 N. Z. L. R. 610; Abdul Ghafoor v. The Crown PLD 1952 Lah. 624; Maulvi Farid Ahmad v. Government of West Pakistan PLD 1965 (W.P.) Lah. 135; Dr. Ejaz Hassan Qureshi and others v. Government of Punjab and others PLD 1978 Lah. 1419; Raja Abdul Qayyum v. Ch. Latif Akbar, Advocate and others 1994 CLC 2041; Kh. M. Sharif v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary and others PLD 1988 Lah. 725…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492