| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2002 SLG 1782 2002 SLD 1782 2002 PLC 491 |
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeals Nos.57(R) C.E. of 2000, 1696(R), 1698(R), 1699(R), 1700(R), 1701(R). 1702(R), 1703(R), 1704(R), 1705(R), 1706(R),........1946(R), 1947(R), 1948(R), 1949(R), 1998(R) of 1999, 67(R)/C.E. and 68(R)/C. E. of 2000, decision dated: 19-06-2000.
AFTAB AHMED AND ABDUL HAMEED KHAN KHATTAK, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeals Nos.57(R) C.E. of 2000, 1696(R), 1698(R), 1699(R), 1700(R), 1701(R). 1702(R), 1703(R), 1704(R), 1705(R), 1706(R),........1946(R), 1947(R), 1948(R), 1949(R), 1998(R) of 1999, 67(R)/C.E. and 68(R)/C. E. of 2000, decision dated: 19-06-2000.
AFTAB AHMED AND ABDUL HAMEED KHAN KHATTAK, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MURID KAZIM SHAH
VS
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN through Chairman and another
Law:
Section:
Agricultural Development Bank Ordinance (IV of 1961)-------S. 39---Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4---Antedated promotion---Entitlement---Employee had claimed that he, despite being senior on merits and in service to co-civil servant and having better and unblemished service record, had been ignored whereas co-civil servant had been granted accelerated promotion---Employee who was subsequently promoted claimed antedated promotion on the ground that one of co-civil servants had been granted antedated promotion---Authority granting accelerated promotion to co-civil servant had justified its action contending that obtaining of approval of Federal Government was not legal requirement and there was no need for prior approval as the same was "one time exercise" under S.39, Agricultural Development Bank Ordinance, 1961---Validity--Contention of Authority was repelled because under S. 39 of the Ordinance, it was not "one time exercise" but was "all/many times exercise"---Bank Authority was obliged to obtain approval from Federal Government whenever any regulation was introduced with regard to terms and conditions of service of the Bank employees and unless said approval was sought, no regulation so introduced could take effect---No prior approval having been sought by the Authority from Federal Government before or after framing Annual Promotion Policy about accelerated promotion same was violative of proviso to S.39 of the Ordinance, which was mandatory and obligatory in nature--Employee who was also sailing in the same boat by claiming to be at par with those to whom accelerated promotion was granted, could therefore, not be benefited under the policy of accelerated promotion nor his ordinary promotion could be antedated on that account. Abdur Rahim Bhatti for Appellants (in Appeals Nos. 1698 to 1709, 1716 to 1718, 1720, 1819 to 1823 and 1998(R) of 1999) Abdur Rashid Saqib for Appellants (in Appeals Nos.1719,1869, and 1898(R) of 1999). Fazal Hussain Choudhry for Appellants (in Appeals Nos. 1696, 1712, 1766 and 1770(R) of 1999). Raja Muhammad Asghar Khan for Appellants (in Appeals Nos. 1713 to 1715(R) of 1999). Azid Nafees for Appellants (in Appeals Nos. 1809…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492