| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2004 SLG 1311 2004 SLD 1311 2004 SCMR 1941 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.95 of 2003, decision dated: 8-09-2004.(On appeal from the judgment dated 22-11-2002 passed by Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in Writ Petition No.477 of 2001)
SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN AND FAQIR MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR, JJ
Gulzarin Kiani, Advocate Supreme Court, wit S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Abdul Sattar, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad Zahoor Qureshi, Advocate-5n-record for
Respondents Nos. 1-4. Nemo for other
Respondents
Civil Petition No.95 of 2003, decision dated: 8-09-2004.(On appeal from the judgment dated 22-11-2002 passed by Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in Writ Petition No.477 of 2001)
SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN AND FAQIR MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR, JJ
Gulzarin Kiani, Advocate Supreme Court, wit S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Abdul Sattar, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad Zahoor Qureshi, Advocate-5n-record for
Respondents Nos. 1-4. Nemo for other
Respondents
RAHM BADSHAH-
VS
ZALIA KHAN and 5 others
Law:
Section:
North-West Frontier Province Pre-emption Act (X of 1987)---Ss. 31 & 32---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)---Suit for pre-emption ---Limitation---Knowledge of transfer of property---Disputed mutation of sale was attested on 24-11-1998, and the suit of pre-emption was filed on 1-6-1999---Trial Court rejected the suit under O.VII., R.11 C.P.C. being barred by limitation under S.31 of North-West. Frontier Province pre-emption Act, 1987--Plea raised by the pre-emptor was that the provisions of Ss.31 and 32 of North-West Frontier' Province Pre¬emption Act, 1987, were interdependent---Validity---If the legislature had intended to make the provisions of S.31 of the Act, 1987, dependent upon the provisions of S.32 of North-West Frontier Province Pre-emption Act; 1987, it could have conveniently inserted the relevant and important ingredients of S.32 of North-West Frontier Province Pre-emption Act, 1987, into the provisions of S.31 of the Act, 1987---Having not done so, both the sections could not be interpreted to be interdependent---Mode of knowledge provided in S.31 of North-West Frontier Province Pre¬emption Act, 1987, was wider in ambit than the mode of knowledge attained through the provisions of its S.32---Latter section did not deal with the question of limitation but might be relevant with regard to the performance of Talbs---Supreme Court declined to interfere with the order passed by Trial Court as well as High Court---Leave to appeal was refused. Nur-ul-Haq's case 2000 SCMR 1305 fol. Mian Asif Islam's case PLD 2001 SC 499 and Muhammad Shah's case 2004 SCMR 535 ref. JUDGMENT SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN, J.---Rahm Badshah seeks leave to appeal against the judgment, dated 22-11-2002 of Peshawar High Court whereby his writ petition was dismissed. 2. Plaint filed by Rahm Badshah in a pre-emption suit stands rejected under Order VII, rule 11 of the C.P.C. on the ground that the sale Mutation No.536 having been attested on 24-11-1998, his suit filed on 1-6-1999 was barred under section 31 of the N.-W.F.P. Pre-emption Act, 1987. The position is correct factually as well as legally. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken the stance that the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492