Case Details

Citation(s)
2003 SLG 902 2003 SLD 902 2003 PLC 414
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.19477 of 2000 and Intra-Court Appeal No.477 of 2002, decision dated: 19-06-2002.
CH. IJAZ AHMAD AND SYED ZAHID HUSSAIN, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD SHAKOOR

VS

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman, Islamabad and 2 others

Law:

Section:

Federal Public Service Commission Rules For Competitive Examination, 1996--------Rr.6(iii)(g) & 15---Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S.3(2), proviso----Intra-Court Appeal, maintainability of---Principle of approbate and reprobate---Waiver and estoppel, principle of---Appellant who appeared in C.S.S. Examination was selected on basis of Punjab Domicile and was allocated to Postal Group which he joined---Appellant filed representation before Federal Public Service Commission, but no order having been passed on his representation, he filed representation before Chairman of Federal Public Service Commission which was rejected---Appellant then filed Constitutional petition which was dismissed by Single Judge of High Court against which he filed Intra-Court Appeal---Appellant had contended that though appeal was not maintainable under proviso to S.3(2) of Law Reform Ordinance 1972, but as no appeal, revision or review was provided under federal Public Service Commission Rules for Competitive Examination, 996 in view of R.15 thereof, Infra-Court Appeal was maintainable-Validity---Appellant having himself filed representation before Chairman. Federal Public Service Commission against intimation of Federal Public service Commission, he could not say that Chairman, Federal Public Service commission had no authority to hear and decide lis before him on principle of 'approbate and reprobate'---Appellant having submitted representation in form of review before Chairman, Federal Public Service Commission, he was estopped after its rejection, to wriggle out from that position on principle of waiver and estoppel ---Intra-Court Appeal filed by appellant, was not maintainable. Ali Ahmad and others v. Muhammad Siddiq and others KLR 1991 Civil Case 132; Ghulam Rasool's case PLD 1971 SC 376; Chaudhry Haq Nawaz Chohan's case 1994 CLC 1530; Muhammad Abdullah v. Deputy Settlement Commissioner PLD 1985 SC 107 and Mst. Karim Bibi v. Hussain Bakhsh and others PLD 1984 SC 344 ref. Muhammad Arif Raja for Appellant. ORDER The brief facts out of which this intra-Court appeal has arisen are that the appellant appeared in C.S.S. Examination held by the respondent in the year 1996. The…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492