Case Details

Citation(s)
1969 SLG 486 1969 SLD 486 (1969) 73 ITR 373

CASE REFERRED No. 20 OF 1965, dated November 25, 1968
JAGANMOHAN REDDY, C.J. AND RAMACHANDRA RAO, J.
C. Mallikarjuna Rao for the Applicant. T. Anantha Babu for the
Respondent.

Smt. Pankumari Kochar

v.

Controller of Estate Duty

Law:

Section:

Section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Gifts whenever made where doner not entirely excluded - Deceased settled a property in trust - From trust deed it was found that deceased intended to convey properties which belonged to him to trustees i.e., himself being sole trustee and seven other relatives - However such conveyance was not done by deceased through registered documents - Whether in aforesaid circumstances it could be concluded that deceased had not diverted himself of property and he must be said to have died possessed of those properties - Held, yes - Whether therefore section 10 would apply and estate duty authorities had rightly included those properties in estate of deceased - Held, yes Section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Property deemed to pass - Gifts whenever made doner not entirely excluded - Deceased gifted property to his wife and relatives prior to commencement of Act - However properties were transferred after commencement of Act - Though properties were gifted, deceased had utilised rental income from those properties for his own business and other properties - No evidence was found of any exclusive possession and enjoyment by donee - Whether, on facts, value of gifted property was to be included in estate of deceased - Held, yes Section 46 of the Estate Duty Act 1953 - Deductions - Further limitations - Deceased gifted property to his wife and relatives - Accountable person claimed certain liabilities for deduction from value of estate of deceased - From books of deceased it was found that accumulated rents from gifted property were credited to personal accounts of donnees - Whether resources of properties in whose personal accounts accumulated rents had been credited included properties derived from deceased - Held, yes - Whether therefore board was justified in holding that liabilities were traceable to original gifts given by deceased and, therefore, stood excluded under section 46 - Held, yes FACTS The deceased died on 13-1-1957, leaving his widow, the accountable person. The deceased was the sole surviving coparcener of a joint Hindu family which carried on business as bankers and money-lenders. The Assistant Controller of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492