Case Details

Citation(s)
2007 SLG 1907 2007 SLD 1907 2007 CLC 1439
Lahore High Court
Commercial Appeal No.3 of 2005 decided on 12-04-2007.
SH. AZMAT SAEED AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

KHAN MUHAMMAD, F.C.A.

VS

SECURITY EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN

Law:

Section:

(a) Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984)-------Ss. 260(1), 255 & 476---S. R. O. No. 45(I)/2003 dated 13-1-2003--Notice under S.260(1) read with Ss.255 & 476 of Companies Ordinance, 1984 by the Security Exchange Commission of Pakistan alleging non-compliance by auditor (appellant) with the provisions of S.235, Companies Ordinance, 1984 read with S.R.O. No.45(I)/2003, dated 13-1-2003 to the preparation of audited account statement of the Company (his client) wherein he failed to "transfer the amount of incremental depreciation from surplus on revaluation of fixed assets account to un-appropriated profit/accumulated loss account through statement of changes in equity"---Auditor contested the notice and was heard by the Commission who passed .the order of adverse action against the auditor---Validity---Impugned order of the Commission contained a discussion on the general obligations of auditors but no discussion whatsoever of the constitutive facts of the case was found meriting adverse action against the auditor---Impugned order neither specified the default of the auditor that was found to be established on record nor same pointed out the relevant legal provisions that consequently stood infringed by the auditor's conduct---Sifting of the facts by the impugned order was necessary to sustain a finding of liability against the auditor---Commission, as a statutory body was also under an obligation to pass speaking orders specifying grounds upon which parties before it, were found to be delinquent---Without providing the relevant factual context the general description of the duties and obligations of an auditor given in the impugned order were a theoretical rendition that had no nexus with establishing liability of the auditor---Impugned order was defective for failing to specify the precise factual defaults of the auditor which were determined to be duly established on record and which were found to constitute violations of specified Legal obligations for which sanctions contemplated by law may be imposed---Said ingredients were necessary to lawfully impose liability on the auditor---Such particulars were essential for facilitating the appellate forum to…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492