Case Details

Citation(s)
2005 SLG 966 2005 SLD 966 2005 PLC 806
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No.662 of 2001, decision dated: 28-02-2005. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 23-6-2000 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in Appeal No. 1675(R) of 1999).
SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN AND MIAN SHAKIRULLAH, JAN, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MANAGING DIRECTOR, OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD.

VS

Syed NAJMUL HASSAN NAQVI

Law:

Section:

(a) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)-------S. 4---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.80 & O.VII, R.11--­Premature appeal---Effect---Any suit or cause of action which is premature, does not entail dismissal of that cause but it results into rejection under O.VII, R.11 C.P.C. that does not operate as res judicata---If appeal before Service Tribunal is premature, it should be returned by Registrar so as to be re-submitted after maturity of cause of action. Abdullah Bhai's case PLD 1964 SC 106; Muhammad Usman's case PLD 1983 SC 436; Syed Aftab Ahmed's case 1999 SCMR 197; Pakistan International Airlines Corporation's case 1999 PLC (C.S.) 1539 and Sui Southern Gas Company Limited's case 2003 PLC (C.S.) 796 ref. (b) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)--- ----S. 4---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, R.11---Premature appeal---Filing of appeal before expiry of ninety days---Penalty of compulsory retirement, setting aside of---Civil servant was compulsory retired from service but Service Tribunal allowed appeal and set aside the penalty---Plea raised by the authorities was that civil servant had filed appeal after eighty days from filing of departmental representation, thus the appeal was premature the same merited dismissal by Service Tribunal---Validity---If at the initial stage, by serious omission; the timely return of appeal was avoided and the cause of action was allowed to mature during pendency of appeal and on the fag end of proceedings, the appeal was dismissed on the ground that the initial submission was premature, such volte face if taken by Service Tribunal, could not be endorsed under any canon of justice---Premature matters were not bad but simply, premature and must be returned---Failure to return the appeal debarred the Tribunal to subsequently jeopardize rights and bona fide claims of civil servants---Service Tribunal was required to return the appeal at the very first instance, if such course was not adhered to, then the Tribunal subsequently could not damage the civil servant on the grounds of prematurity of appeal when the same had become mature during the pendency allowed by Service Tribunal itself---Service Tribunal had rightly…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492