Case Details

Citation(s)
1969 SLG 424 1969 SLD 424 (1969) 72 ITR 59
Bombay High Court
IT REFERENCE No. 8 OF 1963, NOVEMBER 22, 1968
KOTVAL, C.J. AND V.S. DESAI, J.
G.N. Joshi and R.J. Joshi for the Applicant. R.J. Kolah and S.E. Dastur for the
Respondent.

Commissioner of IncomE tax

v.

Balvantrai S. Jain

Law:

Section:

Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [Corresponding to section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922] - Income escaping assessment - Assessment year 1944-45 - Assessee filed return for relevant assessment year wherein he did not mention whether he was a partner in firm - Subsequently accountant of assessee wrote two letters mentioning that assessee had been a partner in firm but as there had been dispute regarding affairs of partnership firm same was not disclosed in return - It was also stated in said letters that assessee's claim was subject to outcome of dispute of said firm - Assessment was completed as per assessee's claim - Later department initiated action under section 34(1)(a) on ground that assessee failed to disclose full and true particulars of its income at time of assessment in as much assessee was a partner in a firm and assessee had earned profit therefrom - Whether profits in question for which assessee became liable was ascertained when assessment of firm was made on 17-12-1949, therefore, till that date assessee could not be charged with omission or failure to disclose fully and truly that fact - Held, yes - Whether therefore, Tribunal was right in holding that assessee had not been guilty of any omission or failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment for assessment year in question - Held, yes FACTS The assessee was doing business as a contractor and was being assessed as an individual. In the year 1941 he joined a partnership firm. When the assessee made his return for the assessment year 1942-43, the assessee filed full details regarding the said partnership. In the form of return for that year Part III was a part requiring the disclosure of information in cases where the assessee was a partner in a firm or firms. In 1942-43, details about his partnership were disclosed but when the assessee made his returns for the assessment years 1943-44 and 1944-45 Part III was not filed up. A similar return for the assessment year 1944-45 was filled up by the assessee on 11-5-1945 though it bore the date 24-4-1945. Before and after this return for 1944-45, was made, a firm of chartered accountants on behalf of the assessee…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492