Case Details

Citation(s)
2003 SLG 2521 2003 SLD 2521 2003 CLC 550
Lahore High Court
Writ Petitions Nos.19765 of 2000 and 4794 of 2001, heard on 2-09-2002.
MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ, J

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

VS

GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Local Government and Rural Development Department, Punjab, Lahore and 5 others

Law:

Section:

(a) Punjab Local Councils (Audit) Rules, 1981--------R. 27---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.12(2)---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Initiation of pre­ surcharge proceedings against lawyer of Zila Council---Validity---High Court keeping in view rule of consistency had disposed of Constitutional petition of Zila Council in presence of its lawyer (petitioner) on same terms on which an earlier Constitutional petition had been decided---Such decision of High Court withstood scrutiny of Supreme Court on the touchstone of fairness of conditions laid down therein and stated to be agreed by petitioner (lawyer)---Supreme Court found such agreement to be just and fair to both the parties and that its terms could- be acted upon---No Court, much less an Audit Officer of Zila Council, had lawful authority to overrule such observation of Supreme Court, unless a case of fraud, misrepresentation or lack of jurisdiction was made out in properly constituted proceedings---No application under S.12(2), C.P.C. had been filed either in High Court or Supreme Court to question the order on such grounds---Nothing was on record to show as to how petitioner (lawyer) was responsible, when he had joined office of Zila Council long after such order had been implemented---High Court accepted Constitutional petition and declared proceedings initiated against petitioner (lawyer) to be without lawful authority. (b) Counsel and client---- ---- Compromise or agreement by counsel---Validity---Counsel has complete authority under terms of his power of attorney to act in the interest of his client and even to enter into a compromise or agreement for decision of a given case. (c) Punjab Local Councils (Audit) Rules, 1981--- ----R. 27(1)---Pre-surcharge certificate issued to lawyer of Local Council---Validity---Term "acting on behalf of the Local Council" as used in sub-clause (iv) of R.27(1) of Punjab Local Councils (Audit) Rules, 1981 would be read ejusdem generis with earlier three terms as used in sub-clauses (i) to (iii) of R.27(1)---Person falling in such three categories, if acting on behalf of Local Council could be proceeded against under the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492