Law:

Section:

Civil service-------Dismissal from service---Reinstatement---Employee was dismissed from service on the charge that he remained absent from duty for the last two/three years---Period for which employee had been charged for being absent, had been paid by the Department---Employee had been prosecuted in a slipshod manner without noticing material error of pays being paid to him without giving proper weight to his absence or no-n­absence---Alleged prolonged absence though was a serious charge, but haphazard prosecution was another proof of departmental slackness---Employee was reinstated with direction to the Authorities to hold a de novo proceedings against employee---Fate of intervening period would be decided after conclusion of said de novo proceedings. Dr. Eshan-ul-Haq, Counsel for Appellant. Muhammad Naeem Malik, District Allorney for Respondents. Date of hearing: 21st September, 2005. JUDGMENT CH. MUHAMMAD ZAFAR IQBAL, (MEMBER).---The appellant was departmentally prosecuted on the basis of show-cause notice No.1052/RSP dated 10-2-2004 on the charge that he had remained absent from duty for the last two/three years. 2. On the basis of this prolonged absence, he was dismissed from service vide order No.756-58/RSP/H.Q. dated 20-2-2004 by the competent authority, which was upheld by the appellate authority vide order No.1422/PA dated 30-7-2004. 3. Aggrieved by these orders the appellant filed the instant appeal No.1654 of 2004. After its regular admission, the comments of the respondents were sought and are placed on file. 4. During the arguments…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492