Case Details

Citation(s)
2007 SLG 2667 2007 SLD 2667 2007 CLC 151
Peshawar High Court

MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL AND MALIK MANZOOR HUSSAIN, JJ
Fayaz Ahmad for Petitioner. Qazi Muhammad Aaqil for
Respondents.

CHAMAN ZADA

VS

SHAH ZEB and 2 others

Law:

Section:

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)--- ----Ss. 2(c) & 13---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Ejectment application---"Landlord"---Definition---Ejectment petition filed by a person who was not owner of the suit property---Maintainability---Landlord may not be in stricto sensu the owner of the rent premises---Person collecting rent on behalf of the owners could be termed as "landlord"---Constitutional petition was dismissed. (b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)--- ----S. 13---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Ejectment application---Landlord and tenant, relationship of---If a tenant denies the relationship of landlord and tenant, tenancy was automatically terminated and he was liable to eviction. Muhammad Shah Alam v. Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor 1979 SCMR 443; Muhammad Yousaf v. Asghar Hussain 1980 SCMR 886; Muhammad Rafique and 6 others v. Khalid Rauf and another 1986 SCMR 1985 and Ghulam Samdani v. Abdul Hamid 1992 SCMR 1170 rel. (c) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)--- ----S. 13---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Ejectment application--- Landlord and tenant--- Rule of estoppel---Scope---Petitioner inducted as tenant under a written agreement, could not challenge the title of the landlord without first surrendering the possession to him. Province of Punjab v. Mufti Abdul Ghani PLD 1985 SC 1 and Madrassa Darul Uloom v. Additional District Judge PLD 1992 SC 401 rel. (d) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)--- ----S. 13---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Ejectment application---Concurrent findings of two courts below---Hallmark of constitutional jurisdiction was to foster justice and to right a wrong---Constitutional jurisdiction could not be exercised in favour of the person who came to Court with soiled hands in order to satisfy from greedy and covetous instincts---Concurrent findings recorded by two Courts of competent jurisdiction after due consideration of material on record, were not open to question in…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492