| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2002 SLG 1850 2002 SLD 1850 2002 PLC 933 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 536 of 2001, decision dated: 8-01-2002. (On appeal from the judgment/order dated 4-1-2001 passed by Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in Appeal No. 211 (P)/CS of 2000).
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, HAMID ALI MIRZA AND TANVIR AHMED KHAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition No. 536 of 2001, decision dated: 8-01-2002. (On appeal from the judgment/order dated 4-1-2001 passed by Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in Appeal No. 211 (P)/CS of 2000).
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, HAMID ALI MIRZA AND TANVIR AHMED KHAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE
VS
INSPECTORGENERAL, FRONTIER CORPS, NW.F.P., PESHAWAR and others
Law:
Section:
Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)-------S. 4---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)---Removal from service for disobeying lawful orders---Petitioner being employee of Frontier Corps, was awarded such punishment, against which his departmental appeal as well as appeal before Service Tribunal were dismissed---Validity---Inquiry Committee had collected sufficient material to establish that petitioner was guilty of not obeying lawful orders of his command, which conduct was against the good order of service---Petitioner being a member of disciplinary force was bound to have carried out lawful orders issued by his command, but he had been reluctant to do so---Petitioner had bycotted the departmental examination and instigated other members of the force not to appear in examination---Petitioner wanted to have examiner of his own choice, which was not permissible on any principle of law---When Inquiry Committee was constituted, petitioner did not accept its composition and prayed that its members might be taken from some other units---Such conduct of petitioner was sufficient to prove that he had no care about the orders of the command and had intentionally violated lawful orders---Such conduct of the petitioner was not only unbecoming for a member of Disciplinary Force, but was seriously objectionable being a servant of Government---Judgment passed by Service Tribunal was not open to any exception---Supreme Court refused to grant leave to appeal and dismissed the petition in circumstances. Petitioner in person. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 8th January, 2002. ORDER IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.---This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 4th January, 2001 -whereby service appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 11th March, 2000 whereby he was removed from service, has been dismissed. 2. Precisely stating facts of the case are that petitioner was working as Junior Clerk in Frontier Corps. He was supposed to appear in departmental examination schedule of which was announced by office order dated 25th May, 1999 and examination was commenced on 28th September, 1999 at 8-30 a.m. but in the said date the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492