| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2004 SLG 1146 2004 SLD 1146 2004 SCMR 1213 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Review Petition No.257 of 2001 in Civil Appeal No.254 of 1995, decision dated: 30-03-2004
NAZIM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI, C.J., JAVED IQBAL AND ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, JJ
Aftab Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate on-Record (absent) for Petitioner. Shahid Hamid, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2
Civil Review Petition No.257 of 2001 in Civil Appeal No.254 of 1995, decision dated: 30-03-2004
NAZIM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI, C.J., JAVED IQBAL AND ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, JJ
Aftab Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate on-Record (absent) for Petitioner. Shahid Hamid, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2
DAEWOO CORPORATION
VS
ZILA COUNCIL, JHANG and 2 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) -- Art. 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O.XXVI Review of Supreme Court Rehearing of appeal All points agitated before Supreme Court while arguing the appeal had been dilated upon and decided in a comprehensive manner in the under review ¬Effect Scope of review was, limited and no error floating on record having been pointed out by the petitioner, review petition was dismissed. (b) Supreme Court Rules, 1980 O. XXVI Review of Supreme Court Scope Review petition is not competent where neither any new and important matter or evidence has been discovered nor any mistake or error is apparent on the face of the record Such error may be an error of fact or of law but it must be self evident and floating on surface and not requiring any elaborate discussion or process of ratiocination If or finding, although suffering from an erroneous assumption of facts, is sustainable on other grounds available on record, review is not justifiable notwithstanding error being apparent on the face of record. Master Tahilram v. Lilaram 1970 SCMR 622; Abdul Khaliq Qureshi v. Chief Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner 1968 SCMR 800; Rehmatullah v. Abdul Majid 1968 SCMR 838; Hassan Din v. Claims Commissioner, Lahore 1968 SCMR 1047; Qamar Din v. Maula Bakhsh 1968 SCMR 1042; Muhammad Akram v. State 1970 SCMR 418; Nawab Bibi v. Hamida Begum 1968 SCMR 104 and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto v. State 1979 SCMR 427 ref. ORDER JAVED IQBAL, J. The petitioner seeks review of the judgment, dated 30 3 2001 of this Court whereby the Civil Appeal bearing No. 254 of 1995 preferred on behalf of the respondents have been accepted. 2. Heard Mr. Aftab Ahmad Khan, learned Advocate Supreme Court on behalf of petitioner and Mr. Shahid Hamid learned Senior Advocate Supreme Court for respondents at length. All the points agitated before the Court while arguing the said appeal have been…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492