Case Details

Citation(s)
2008 SLG 2183 2008 SLD 2183 2008 CLD 761
Sindh High Court
Ist Appeals Nos.68 to 73 and 79 of 2006 and C.M.A. No.484 of 2007, heard on 15-02-2008.
MRS. QAISER IQBAL AND SYED MAHMOOD ALAM RIZVI, JJ
Raja Qasit Nawaz for Appellant. Sadar-ud-Din Huda for
Respondent No. 1. Muhammad Yaseen Azad for
Respondent No. 5.

Messrs CLIMAX PRINTERS through Proprietor and another

VS

. Messrs HABIB BANK LTD. and 5 others

Law:

Section:

(a) Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)-------Ss. 15(6) & 19---Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S.15---Money decree, execution of -Auction of mortgaged property in possession of tenant---Conformation of auction in favour of auction-purchaser-Order of Banking Court directing tenant to deliver possession of such property to auction¬-purchaser---Validity---Statutory tenant had a right to remain on premises and no one could eject/dispossess him without due course of law---Banking Court, in absence of explicit provision could not put auction purchaser into possession of such property---Legislative intent could not be construed to deprive tenant of his right to occupy property guaranteed under law in presence of documentary evidence confirming his status---High Court set aside impugned order in circumstances. Mst. Zarina Khawaja and others v. Agha Mehboob Shah PLD 1988 SC 190; Mst. Mubarak Shah v. Banking Court No.III 2005 CLD 515 and M. Ghana v. M. A. Mullick and 3 others 1973 SCMR 90 rel. (b) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)--- ---S.15---Statutory tenant, right of---Scope---Such tenant had a right to remain on premises and no one could dispossess/eject him without due course of law. JUDGMENT MRS. QAISER IQBAL, J.---By this common judgment we proposed to dispose of 1st Appeals Nos. 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 and 79 of 2006 arising out of the impugned order dated 19-8-2006 passed by Incharge Judge of learned Banking Court No.III, Karachi in Execution Application No. 1 of 2005 filed in suit No.73 of 2003 whereby the appellants were directed to vacate premises in their occupation bearing G/1, G/2, G-3, 1/3 bearing No. RB-9/20, D.S. No.III-A-187, Ramchard Karamchand Building, Arambagh Quarters, Karachi being statutory tenants were protected under the law. 2. The facts leading to the appeals are that the respondent No. 1 filed suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 73,10,144 with a mark-up succeeded in obtaining a decree for the sale of the mortgage property, consequent thereupon filed Execution Application No. 1 of 2005, the property was put to auction. The respondent No. 5, who is brother-in-law of real brother…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492