| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 3067 2006 SLD 3067 2006 PLD 497 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No. 162 and C.M.A. No. 424 of 2006, heard on 26th April, 2006
ZIA PERWAZ AND AMIR HANI MUSLIM, JJ
Abdul Qayoom Shaikh and Nazeer Ahmed Pathan for Petitioners. Muhammad Nawaz Shaikh for respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Ghularn Dastagir Shahani, Addl. A.G.
Constitutional Petition No. 162 and C.M.A. No. 424 of 2006, heard on 26th April, 2006
ZIA PERWAZ AND AMIR HANI MUSLIM, JJ
Abdul Qayoom Shaikh and Nazeer Ahmed Pathan for Petitioners. Muhammad Nawaz Shaikh for respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Ghularn Dastagir Shahani, Addl. A.G.
BAKHAT ALI and another
VS
SHAHNAWAZ and 15 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Sindh Local Government Elections Rules, 2005--- ----R. 76---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Election petition---Corrupt and illegal practice, charge of---Recounting to ballot papers, application for---Absence of prayer in application for re-counting of counter-foils of ballot papers---Irregularity in counter-foils---Non-recording of evidence of parties---Election Tribunal while deciding such application declared election as a whole void on ground of such irregularity and adoption of such practice by returned candidate in collusion with polling staff---Validity---In absence of prayer in application and without proof of such irregularity, Election Tribunal could not un-seat the returned candidate on such ground---Allegations in election petition in absence of evidence could not be treated as proof against returned candidate---Satisfaction of Election Tribunal had to be objective satisfaction which was absent in the present case---High Court set aside impugned order in circumstances. Muhammad Naeem v. Ashraf 2005 SCMR 1130 and Rana Muhammad Mustafa v. Javed Iqbal Siddiqui 2004 YLR. 993 distinguished. (b) Pleadings-- ---Pleadings of parties could never be treated as evidence. (c) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ---Art. 122---Fact alleged by a party---Burden of proof---Such party had to prove such fact. ORDER AMIR HANI MUSLIM, J.---Through this petition the petitioners have impugned the order dated 18-3-2006 passed by the Respondent No.13 whereby he has declared the whole elections as void as a consequence the petitioners who were declared as returned candidate were unseated. The facts as it appears from the record are that respondents Nos. 1 and 2 contested election for the seat of Nazim and Naib Nazim of U.C. Shah Abdul Latif District Khairpur and the respondents Nos. 1 to 10 were also contesting candidates. The petitioners secured 1726 votes and were declared returned candidates, whereas respondents Nos. 1 and 2 had secured, 1576 votes The respondents Nos. 1 and 2 had challenged the election of the petitioners by way of Election Petition No.7 of 2005, before the respondent No.13 inter alia on the ground of corrupt and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492