Case Details

Citation(s)
2010 SLG 3064 2010 SLD 3064 2010 PLC 229
Supreme Court (AJ&K)
(On appeal from the order of the High Court Dated 10-6-2006 in Writ Petitions Nos.81, 82 and 92 of 2003). Civil Appeals Nos.60, 58, 59 of 2004 and 55 of 2006, decided on 30th April, 2009.
KHAWAJA SHAHAD AHMAD AND MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Civil Appeal No.60 of 2004 AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR UNIVERSITY, through Registrar and 2 others

VS

Prof. (Retd.) MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN Civil Appeal No.58 of 2004 AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR UNIVESITY through Registrar and 2 others vs AMIN TARIQ QASMI Civil

Law: Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974

Section: 42(11)(12)

(a) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974)---   ----S. 42(11)(12)---Civil service---Medical allowance---Validity---Entitlement to---Appeal to Supreme Court---Syndicate of the University decided that in lieu of medical facility, the university employees would receive medical allowance 15% of their initial pay subject to minimum of Rs.125 and maximum of Rs.250 per month---Said facility was extended to university pensioners vide notification---Subsequently Vice-Chancellor of the University cancelled said notification of grant of medical allowance---Writ petition filed against order of Vice-Chancellor was dismissed by the High Court, but Supreme Court struck down notification whereby the Vice-Chancellor had cancelled grant of medical allowances holding that Vice-Chancellor had no power to withdraw the notification issued by the Syndicate---Employees, in the light of of Supreme Court, submitted the medical allowance bill to the Director Finance of the University, who refused to make payment; whereupon they filed separate writ petitions---High Court accepted said writ petitions and directed the. University Authorities to pay medical allowance--Pensioners/respondents had vested right to receive benefit of medical allowance and right once accrued could not be withdrawn arbitrarily---Pensioners having already been declared entitled to receive the medical allowance filing the writ petitions at later stage for enforcement of that right, would not affect their vested right---Medical allowance facility which was sanctioned in favour of the pensioners/respondents, was a part of pensionary benefit---Once it became due it had to be paid to the pensioners and question of limitation or laches would not arise at all---Appeals were dismissed.     Raja Shoukat Mehmood v. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government through its Chief Secretary Civil Secretariat Muzaffargarh and another 2003 PLC (C.S.) 424; Mir Abdul Hamid v. Azad Government and 2 others 1997 PLC (C.S.) 805; Ejaz Ahmad Awan and 5 others v. Syed Manzoor Ali Shah and another 1999 PLC (C.S.) 1439; Rao Solat Yasin Khan v. Director-General, Federal Directorate of Education, Islamabad and 2…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492