Law: Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan Rules, 1989

Section: 9(a),8,9,12,43

Law: Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973

Section: 55(u),56

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

(a) Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act (XXXV of 1973)--- ---Ss. 55 & 56---Supreme Court Bar Association Rules, Rr.8, 9, 12 & 43---Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S. 3---Intra-Court appeal had arisen out of order passed by Single Judge in constitutional petition---Main grievance of appellant in constitutional petition was that reduction of the terms of the Office-Bearers and Executive Committee of Supreme Court Bar Association from two years to one year was not in the interest of Association; that the elected office-bearers were not in a position to achieve their object for which they had constituted election; and the term of one year for Supreme Court Bar Association was ridiculously low and deficient for performing of their obligations to achieve the goal---Arguments of appellant had been opposed before Single Judge contending that amendment made in Rules, 8, 9 & 12 of Supreme Court Bar Association Rules, was in the best interest of all the members of Association who represented all the four Provinces of Pakistan---None of the Elected Representatives of Supreme Court Bar Association or any other Member of the Bar having supported appellant in that matter, contentions of appellant having no force, were repelled---Rules being not statutory in nature, any violation of statutes, Regulations or Rules would not attract constitutional jurisdiction of High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution---Supreme Court Bar Association was a body, Organization of Lawyers, who were entitled to practise in Supreme Court, which had not been constituted under any Act of the Parliament, but being a non-statutory body, conditions or rules framed by that body would also be non-statutory rules and would have no legal backing---Constitutional petition under Art.199 of the Constitution against a body, organization not constituted under the law would not be competent---Appellant having not been able to assist the Court in believing that rules of Supreme Court Bar Association were statutory in nature, appeal tiled by appellant against of Single Judge was dismissed. Dr. M. Afzal Beg v. University of Punjab and others 1999 PLC (C.S) 60; Khalid Hussain v. The…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492