| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2001 SLG 1616 2001 SLD 1616 2001 PLC 315 |
National Industrial Relations Commission
Case No.4A(111) of 2000 L, decision dated: 3rd August, 2000
ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Case No.4A(111) of 2000 L, decision dated: 3rd August, 2000
ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
RUKHSANA BASHIR, TELEX OPERATOR, PTC, LAHORE
VS
DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TELEX, LAHORE and another RUKHSANA BASHIR, TELEX OPERATOR, PTC, LAHORE Vs DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TELEX, LAHORE and another
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) Ss. 15(1)(c) & 22 A(8)(g) Withdrawal of benefits Allegation of unfair labour practice of employer Employer in the light of of Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission withdrew benefits of two advance increments earlier granted to petitioner with further direction that petitioner should not be promoted on the basis of ES III Training Petitioner in her petition had challenged said orders contending that the orders had been passed on wrong interpretation and illegal implementation of orders of Full Bench Petitioner had also casually urged in the petition that said orders were result of unfair labour practice Case of petitioner was not that she was member/office bearer of any trade union functioning/operating in establishment of employer nor it had been alleged in her petition that action against her had been taken on account of her trade union activities Jurisdiction of National Industrial Relations Commission was confined only to those cases which had an element of unfair labour practice Petitioner, in circumstances, could not claim that she had been subjected to any discrimination or that she had been victimised for her trade union activities Petitioner having failed to make out any case of unfair labour practice National Industrial Relations Commission had no jurisdiction to deal with her petition Petition was dismissed being not maintainable. ORDER Rukhsana Bashir, Telex Operator, PTC, Lahore has filed this petition under section 15(1)(c) of I.R.O., 1969 against the orders, dated 6 8 199$ and 26 6 1998 respectively passed by respondents Nos. l and 2. 2. Facts forming the background of this petition briefly are that two petitions bearing Nos.4A(3559) of 1995 L and 4A(171) of 1996 L, were filed before this Commission by two sets of employees of PTC. Seven Telephone Operators filed petition under section 22 A(8)(g) of I.R.O., 1969 (Case No.4A(3559) of 1995 L) before this Commission against the Departmental authorities and 08 Telex Operator (respondents 4 to 11) making a grievance therein that they being senior in service, were entitled to be sent to ES.III (Electrical) Course but they were ignored…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492