Law:

Section:

Civil service-------Seniority---Determination of---Civil servant was senior to his co-civil servant---Both were declared surplus and co-civil servant was adjusted in the other Project under the same authority earlier to the civil servant who was also adjusted in that project in the same capacity/cadre---Civil servant despite being senior to the co-civil servant was shown under the co-civil servant in seniority list---Validity---Inter se seniority of officials declared surplus in a batch was to remain intact on joining other project in the same cadre---Civil servant on joining project under the same Authority after being surplus in previous project, was entitled to retain inter se seniority with co-civil servant though both of them were to be placed at the bottom of the list of the officials in the same cadre in new project wherein they were absorbed--­Seniority list was directed to be amended /corrected placing the civil servant over the co-civil servant. Sheikh Riaz-ul-Haq for Appellant. Sajjad Hussain Cheema counsel for Respondents. Respondent No.3 in person. Date of hearing: 27th March, 2001. JUDGMENT AFTAB AHMED, (MEMBER). ---Khan Bacha, Office Assistant at Tarbela Dam Project is aggrieved by seniority list circulated in April, 2000 wherein his name despite being senior has been 'shown under respondent No.3 i.e. Khan Muhammad. 2. Arguing his case Sheikh Riaz-ul-Haq, Advocate submitted that the appellant joined Tarbela Project, WAPDA as Junior Clerk in May, 1984 and promoted as Senior Clerk in April, 1993 whereas respondent No.3 (Khan Muhammad) joined the same Project as Junior Clerk in September, 1987 and promoted as Senior Clerk in October, 1994 and as such the appellant was admittedly senior to him both as Junior Clerk and Senior Clerk. In 1996 both the officials were declared surplus. Khan Muhammad respondent No.3 was adjusted in Ghazi Brotha Project vide Office Order dated 4-4-1996 whereas the appellant who was released by Tarbela Dam Project in December. 1996 was also adjusted in Ghazi Brotha Project vide Office Order dated 3-12-1996 Learned counsel submitted that being senior to respondent No.3 and later having been both declared surplus and joined…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492