| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2004 SLG 1511 2004 SLD 1511 2004 PLC 473 |
Supreme Court (AJ&K)
Civil Appeal No.40 of 2003, decision dated: 11-11-2003.(On appeal from the judgment of the Service Tribunal dated 7-1-2003 in Service Appeal No.299 of 2001).
MUHAMMAD YUNUS SURAKHVI, C.J. AND KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD SAEED, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Appeal No.40 of 2003, decision dated: 11-11-2003.(On appeal from the judgment of the Service Tribunal dated 7-1-2003 in Service Appeal No.299 of 2001).
MUHAMMAD YUNUS SURAKHVI, C.J. AND KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD SAEED, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ZAHEERUDDIN QURESHI
VS
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AJ&K and 2 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Police Rules, 1934-------Rr.12.14 & 12.18---Rapid emotion given to civil servant due to his efficiency and excellent work as recommended by high officials of the Department---Such promotion orders were alleged to have been obtained by civil servant in connivance with such high officials---Allegation without proof---Allegations easy to be made but difficult to be, proved. (b) Administration of justice--- ----Courts of law have to decide cases strictly in accordance with law---If some allegations against somebody stand proved, then action had to be taken, but in absence of proof, no action could be taken. (c) Police Rules, 1934--- ----Rr.12.14 & 12.18---Rapid promotion---Civil servant could not be punished for lapses, if any, committed by high officials of Department in making his rapid promotions. Secretary to Government of N.-W.F.P. Zakat/Social Welfare Department, Peshawar and another v. Sadullah Khan 1996 SCMR 413; Ahmad Latif Qureshi v. Controller of Examinations, Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore and another PLD 1994 Lah. 3 and Syed Imdad Ali Shah and 59 others v. Azad Government and 8 others 2003 SCR 95 rel. Kh. Muhammad Nasim, Advocate for Appellant. Raza Ali Khan, Advocate for Respondents. Date of hearing: 7th November, 2003. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD YUNUS SURAKRVI, C.J.---This appeal, by way of leave of the Court, has been directed against the judgment passed by the Service Tribunal on 7-1-2003, whereby Service Appeal No.299 of 2001 filed by the appellant herein was dismissed. 2. The relevant facts, precisely stated, are that the appellant joined police service as a Constable Driver in Reserve Police on 12-12-1994 He was promoted as Head Constable on 5-11-1995 and then as Assistant Sub-Inspector on 7-2-1996 on the basis of his efficiency and dedication to the duty. The department prepared a final seniority list of Assistant Sub-Inspectors, Reserve Police, vide Annexure `B', and the appellant has been entered in this seniority list at Serial No.38 After that the appellant was awarded selection grade B-11. The order of promotion of appellant as Assistant Sub-Inspector and the seniority list wherein the appellant was entered at…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492