Case Details

Citation(s)
2001 SLG 1758 2001 SLD 1758 2001 PLC 28
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
.Appeals Nos.KAR-174, KAR-175 and KAR-176 of 1998, decision dated: 16-12-1999.
DR. TANZILURREHMAN, CHAIRMAN

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD UMER and 2 others

VS

Messrs PLASTICRAFTERS (PVT.) LTD. through Managing Director

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-------Ss.25-A & 37(x)---West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.O. 15(3)(4)---Dismissal from service--- Re-instatement---Employees were dismissed from service after charge-sheet and holding inquiry on allegation that they instigated other employees to `go slow" ---Enquiry was held against employees, but they boycotted the inquiry proceedings and despite several adjournments employees remained absent and did not take part in inquiry proceedings--­Inquiry Officer had to record statements of witnesses produced by employer in proof of allegations against employees---Inquiry proceedings against employees were taken in a proper manner after issuing number of notices to employees and affording them several opportunities to appear and defend--­Principles of natural justice had not been violated in circumstances--­Evidence on record had fully proved that employees were instrumental in instigating other workers to "go slow"---Order of dismissal based on evidence on record and not suffering from any irregularity, could not be interfered with. M.A.K. Azmati for Appellants. Mahboob Rizvi for Respondent. Date of hearing: 16th December, 1999. JUDGMENT These are three appeals, listed above, under section 37(3), of the industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, against the decision, dated 5-5-1998, passed by the learned Second Sindh Labour Court at Karachi in grievance Applications Nos. 101 of 1997, 102 of 1997 and 103 of 1997 (old Nos. 299 of 1992, 298 of 1992 and 297 of 1992), received by it on transfer from Sindh Labour Court No. 1, where originally the said grievance applications were filed in the year 1992, seeking reinstatement with back benefit, which were dismissed by the learned Presiding Officers, by his order, as aforesaid. 2. Mr. Azmati, learned Advocate for the appellants and Mr. Mahboob Rizvi, representative of the respondent/employer in all the three appeals, submitted that the facts and law involved in all the appeals, are the same. In fact, they argued the appeal of appellant Muhammad Umer and referred to pages of the R&P concerning the said appeal and…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492