| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2001 SLG 2066 2001 SLD 2066 2001 PLC 79 |
National Industrial Relations Commission
Cases Nos.4A(343) K and 24(348) K of 1999, decision dated: 21st August, 2000.
ALLAH RAKHIO LEGHARI, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Cases Nos.4A(343) K and 24(348) K of 1999, decision dated: 21st August, 2000.
ALLAH RAKHIO LEGHARI, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ABDUL KARIM
VS
P.I.A.C. through. Chairman, Karachi and 2 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)Ss. 1 (3) (c) & 22 A(8)(g) National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedure and Functions) Regulations,' 1973, Regln. 32(2)(c) Status quo Issuance of Petition under S. 22 A(8)(g) of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 and application under Regln: 32(2)(c) of National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedure and Functions) Regulations, 1973 for grant of status quo, were filed by employee three days after passing of the dismissal order against him Order dismissing employee from service was sent to the employee by post as at relevant time he was absent from duty Order of dismissal would take effect when it was passed' by the Authority competent to dismiss employee or at the most when said order was posted Effective date of said order would not be the date of communication of the order National Industrial Relations Commission, could not grant status quo after dismissal of employee from service. Pak Arab Refinery Limited v. Muhammad Rashid 1999 SCMR 373; 1997 PLC 10; 1995 PLC 35; 1994 PLC 306; Asahi Industries v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi and 20 others .1980 CLC 550; Tin Plate Company of India Limited. Columri v. Abdul Sattar AIR 1960 Pat. 283; Lord Krishna Textile Mills v. Workmen AIR 1961 SC 860; Banglore Woollen, Cotton and Silk Mills v. Dasappa AIR 1960 SC 1352; Podar Mills v. Bhagwansing 1973 SCC 449:2 LLJ 133 and PLD 1979,Kar. 493 ref. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) S.22 A(8)(g) National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedure and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Regln. 32(2) Status quo Grant of In cases for unfair labour practice likely to be committed, National Industrial Relations Commission was empowered under Regln. 32(2) of National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedure and Functions) Regulations, 1973 to advise or prohibit. all or any of connected persons to do or refrain from doing any act or to conduct their affairs in a manner calculated to avoid occurrence of unfair labour practice, but the Commission had not been vested with such power in respect of unfair labour practice already committed Employee having been dismissed from service prior to filing…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492