Case Details

Citation(s)
2001 SLG 2073 2001 SLD 2073 2001 PLC 113
National Industrial Relations Commission
Case No.4 A (129) of 2000 L, decision dated: 21st July, 2000,
ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA, CHAIRMAN

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

[National Industrial Relations Commission] MUHAMMAD ALTAF

VS

PERMANENT WAY INSPECTOR (P.W.I) PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, HAFIZABAD and 2 others

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) Ss. 1(3) (a) & 22 A(8)(g) Allegation of unfair labour practice of employer by employee Maintainability of petition,. Employee had alleged in his petition that he had been thrown out from service verbally without any charge sheet/show cause notice of personal hearing which act of employer constituted unfair labour practice; Employee at the relevant time was serving as Gang Mate on Railway lines which were essential to the Defence Services of Pakistan during peace and war Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, being not applicable to the employee in circumstances, petition by employee under S.22 A(8)(g) of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 was not maintainable. Petitioner in person. Syed Muhammad Naqi for Respondent No .1. ORDER Petitioner who was employed in Pakistan Railways as Gang Mate has filed this petition under section 22 A(8)(g) of LR.O. alleging that apart from his official duties, he has also been participating in lawful trade union activities for which reason respondent No.11(Permanent Way Inspector, Pakistan Railways, Hafizabad) developed personal grudge against him. The petitioner got sanctioned, two days leave from the said respondent w.e.f. 26 2 2000 and when he came back on duty "respondent No.1 verbally ordered the petitioner to stay away from the office prises" and did not allow him to mark his attendance and further informed him that his services were no more required. Grievance made by the petitioner is that he has been thrown out of service without any charge sheet/show cause notice or personal hearing which acts constitute unfair labour practice on the part of respondent No.1: It is accordingly prayed by the petitioner that the impugned action of the respondents may be declared mala fide, corum non judice, void ab initio and excessive and his verbal termination from service be set aside and the respondents be directed to allow him to perform his duty as usual and they be also restrained from interfering in his lawful trade union activities. 2. Respondents have filed a written statement denying the allegations made by the petitioner. Their contention is that it is not a case of unfair…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492