| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 2495 2006 SLD 2495 2006 SCMR 590 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos.2898-L to 2901-L of 2003, 279-L, 493-L, 68-L and 99-L to 102-L of 2004, decision dated: 23rd December, 2004
KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY AND FATAK SHER, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petitions Nos.2898-L to 2901-L of 2003, 279-L, 493-L, 68-L and 99-L to 102-L of 2004, decision dated: 23rd December, 2004
KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY AND FATAK SHER, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUGHAL SURGICAL (PVT.) LTD. and others
VS
PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.7 and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Payment of Wages Act (IV of 1936)-------Preamble---Object of Payment of Wages Act, 1936---Payment of Wages Act had been enacted for benefit of workmen, which would be interpreted and applied in the spirit leading to its enactment. Syed Match Company Limited's case 2003 SCMR 1493 ref. (b) Appeal (Civil)--- ----Right of appeal---Nature of---Such right is not a natural or an inherent right of litigants, but is a statutory right granted by different laws under different enactments---Such right must be considered and examined in the light of conditions prescribed by law granting such right---Every order and decision is not appealable under C.P.C. and Cr.P.C.---Granting of interim order without deposit of decretal amount is prohibited under some provisions of C.P.C. Mian Abdul Quddoos Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmudul-Islam Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in C.Ps. Nos.2898 to 2901-L of 2003). Rana Nasrullah Khan, Advocate Supreme Court with Haji Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in C.P. No.279-L of 2004). Mahmud-ul-Islam Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in C.P. No.493-L of 2004). M. Saleem Sahgal, Advocate Supreme Court with Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in C.Ps. Nos.68 and 99 to 102-L of 2004). Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 23rd December, 2004. JUDGMENT KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, J.--- This order will dispose of Civil Petitions Nos.2898-L to 2901-L of 2003, 279-L, 493-L, 68-L and 99-L to 102-L of 2004 as all these petitions arise out of the similar facts and involve identical legal issues. 2. Mian Abdul Quddoos, Advocate Supreme Court appearing in the C.Ps. Nos.2898-L to 2901-L of 2003, Rana Nasrullah Khan, Advocate Supreme Court appearing in C.P.279-L of 2004 and Mr. Mahmud-ul-Islam, Advocate-on-Record appearing in C.P. No .493-L of.2004 submit at the very outset that they had instructions to withdraw their respective petitions to enable the petitioners to go back to the appellate forum under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 with fresh appeals after depositing the decretal amount and consequently pray for permission to withdraw the said petitions. 3. The prayer is reasonable and is allowed. Civil…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492