| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2001 SLG 1938 2001 SLD 1938 2001 PLC 702 |
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeal No.2744-K of 1997, decision dated: 30-07-1998.
MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN AND NOOR MUHAMMAD MAGSI, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No.2744-K of 1997, decision dated: 30-07-1998.
MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN AND NOOR MUHAMMAD MAGSI, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ABDUL GHANI CHANNA
VS
THE PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN, Prime Ministers Secretariat Islamabad and 11 others
Law:
Section:
Civil service-------Promotion---Entitlement to---In relevant year when civil servant was serving as a B-19 Officer in Income-tax Group, meeting of Central Selection Board was held for promotion of Officers to B.20---Co-civil servants were recommended to be promoted and finally vide Notification Officers junior to civil servant were promoted considering civil servant to be supersede Civil servant was not considered for promotion as A.C.Rs. of civil servant were not placed before Central Selection Board despite same were ready- Under Promotion Policy record had to be made available to Central Selection Board and particularly the latest A.C.R. should have been given supreme importance while considering case of promotion---Meeting of Central Selection Board was held in 1997, A.C.R. of civil servant for year 1996 which was ready, should have been placed for consideration of Central Selection Board, but despite request of civil servant same was not placed before Central Selection Board---In A.C.R. of 1996 and of previous year civil servant was graded as "very good" and all such A.C.Rs. were available with authority prior to date of meeting of Central Selection Board---In absence of such A.C.Rs. case of civil servant could not have been considered---Authority had contended that even if A.C.R. of civil servant for year 1996 or that of 1994 were placed before Central Selection Board, quantification would still have been deficient and promotion of civil servant was still not possible---Contention of Authority was repelled, because that was job of Central Selection Board and not for Authority---Civil servant was an employee of Income-tax Department which was a most sensitive department attracting a lot of critical observations, but civil servant was fortunate to be assessed as "good" and "very good" in all 18 years of his service while assessing his general and moral integrity as well as intellectual integrity---Service Tribunal accepting appeal of civil servant, modified order of his supersession into that of deferment and directed that case of civil servant should be placed before next meeting of Central Selection Board for considering him for promotion. Sirajul Haq…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492