Case Details

Citation(s)
2006 SLG 2277 2006 SLD 2277 2006 CLC 1576
Peshawar High Court
C.O.C. No.9 of 2006, decision dated: 23rd June, 2006.
SALIM KHAN AND HAMID FAROOQ DURRANI, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD ZAHID and anothers

VS

DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS AND LITERACY, N.W.F.P. PESHAWAR and 2 others

Law:

Section:

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-------Arts. 204 & 19---Constitutional petition---Application for initiating contempt proceedings against respondents---High Court in its directed respondent to re-assess/recheck and make remarking according to the applications accompanied by testimonials of petitioners---Contention of petitioners was that after of High Court they submitted certain documents/testimonials before Committee, but Committee expressed its inability to consider same on the pretext that it was not possible at that stage to consider said documents to avoid complication---Contention of petitioners was that by not considering such documents, respondents had committed contempt of Court---Validity---Nothing was in the order passed by High Court to permit petitioners to submit additional documents to the Committee---Exact words written in said of High Court were "applications accompanied by testimonials of petitioners"---Only those testimonials were to be taken into consideration which accompanied the applications---Exercise of selecting and appointing candidates was complete on basis of available record at the time of such exercise, to which petitioners had objection and that exercise was to be rechecked---Closed chapter of submitting testimonials for the purposes of proving eligibility could not be re­opened---Time bound schedule for submission of applications and documents having been advertised, candidates were bound to submit their documents within that period---Eligibility of candidates was checked on the basis of such record and calls for test/interview were issued to the eligible candidates accordingly---After completion of said exercise, certain rights of preference and appointment accrued to other persons, which could not be snatched by the turn or afterthought of candidate at later stage---Allowing the use of such turn or afterthought would make the whole exercise shaky, unreliable and inconclusive---None of the respondents having intentionally or unintentionally committed any contempt of High Court, petition was dismissed. Lal Khan for Petitioners. Qari Abdur Rasheed, D.A.-G. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 23rd June, 2006. JUDGMENT SALIM…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492