Case Details

Citation(s)
2007 SLG 2991 2007 SLD 2991 2007 PLJ 29
Lahore High Court
Crl. Misc. No. 846/B of 2006, decided on 22.9.2006.
SYED SAJJAD HUSSAIN SHAH, J.
Raja Amjad Mahmood, Advocate for Petitioner. Miss Shamin Ch., Advocate for State

ZULFIQAR AHMED

VS

STATE--Respondent

Law:

Section:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)- ----S. 497--Pakistan Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 381-A & 44--Post-arrest bail--Grant of--Prayer for--Petitioner hired a pick up owned by the complainant and thereafter administering intoxicants to the driver, snatched the vehicle and demanded specified amount for returning of the same--Vehicle has been recovered on the pointation of the petitioner--He has made statement before (FR), and admitted the occurrence as narrated by the complainant--Although, the offence for which the petitioner was charged did not fall under the prohibitory clause but on such sole ground, he was not entitled for the discretionary relief of bail as he was involved in so many other cases of similar nature--Trial Court has rightly held him a hardened criminal--Petitioner did not deserve any leniency--Petition was dismissed. Order Petitioner Zulfiqar Ahmad through the instant petition has sought post-arrest bail in a case FIR No. 129 dated 7.6.2005 under Section 381-A/411 PPC registered with Police Station Fateh Jang, District Attock. 2. Briefly the allegation against the petitioner is that he hired Suzuki Pick up No. LOK/2171 from the complainant for loading rice and selling the same in the area of Fateh Jang. He gave his address being resident of Tehsil Bhalwal. He also gave his Mobile No. 0301-5561085 to the complainant. On 5.6.2005, after administering some intoxicants to the driver of the complainant, took the vehicle to the tribal area. Thereafter he made a call to the complainant from the said mobile number and demanded Rs. 2,00,000/- for taking back his Suzuki Pick up from Dera Adam Khel. He was apprehended from there and vehicle was also recovered from his possession. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case by the police with mala fide intention; the prosecution story is false; the petitioner has no concern with the person named in the FIR; the case against the petitioner calls for further inquiry; he is previous non-convict; he is behind the bars…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492