| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2004 SLG 2636 2004 SLD 2636 2004 PLD 125 |
Peshawar High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 360 of 2003, decided on 21st November, 2003
QAZI EHSANULLAH QURESHI, J
Muhammad Yaqoob Khan Merwat for Petitioner. Shaukat Hayat Khan, D.A.G. for the State. Complainant in person
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 360 of 2003, decided on 21st November, 2003
QAZI EHSANULLAH QURESHI, J
Muhammad Yaqoob Khan Merwat for Petitioner. Shaukat Hayat Khan, D.A.G. for the State. Complainant in person
GULAP KHAN
VS
THE STATE and another
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 457,380
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.457/380---Bail, grant of-- Charge of theft of gold ornaments ---F.I.R. and Recovery memo. contradicted each other and were inconsistent---Such fact required to be thrashed out at trial stage---Case against accused was of further inquiry---Accused was granted bail in circumstances. 1996 SCMR 511 and 2002 SCMR 442 ref. JUDGMENT Accused-petitioner Gulap Khan seeks his release on bail in case F.I.R. No.320 dated 14-8-2003 registered under sections 457/380, P.P.C at Police Station, Lakki. 2. The allegations against the accused-petitioners are that he on the night between 16/17-7-2003 at midnight time alongwith his co-accused committed theft of golden ornaments and cash amount etc. 3. After his arrest, the accused-petitioner applied for bail before the Court of Judicial Magistrate-II, Lakki Merwat who vide his order dated 29-8-2003 rejected the same. His further application before learned Sessions Judge was also rejected vide order dated 10-9-2003. Hence, this petition. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the F.I.R was lodged after 27 days of the occurrence; that initial report was lodged in the daily diary on 17-7-2003 whereby the complainant did not charge any body and suspected his relatives for commission of an offence; that complainant party has not disclosed the source that from where they gathered information that the accused-petitioners are involved in the crime and that the word satisfaction is not sufficient to connect the accused with an offence; that the recovery effected from the goldsmith comprised of one necklace, one ring and ear-Tits whereas in the F.I.R, theft of necklace,…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492